http://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/This blog archives records pertaining to widespread corruption of the justice system in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond...en-EUMokoFeed10http://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/http://data5.blog.de/design/preview/a0/ed8471568c23a9475322172e8be4ff_160x200.jpghttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/10/03/10-10-02-corruption-of-the-courts-the-legal-profession-and-law-enforcement-in-los-angeles-county-california-was-noted-by-the-united-nations-9507774/tag:josephzernik.blog.co.uk,2010-10-03:/2010/10/03/10-10-02-corruption-of-the-courts-the-legal-profession-and-law-enforcement-in-los-angeles-county-california-was-noted-by-the-united-nations-9507774/Sun, 03 Oct 2010 02:23:01 +0200 <p><img src="http://" alt="null" title="null"><br> Los Angeles, October 2 - Human Rights Alert (NGO), a young organization, with no resources at all, got a mention and a reference in the staff report of the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations, [1] as part of the 2010 Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States.<br> The HRC report stated: "HRAlert referred to corruption in the courts and the legal profession, and discrimination of US law enforcement in California. [69]"([ 69]: HRAlert, pages 1-5. See submission for cases cited.)<br> The evidence provided by Human Rights Alert pertained to large-scale false imprisonment at the criminal courts, and real estate fraud in collusion with large financial institutions and law-firms at the civil courts.<br> The cryptic reference in the HRC report regarding "discrimination of US law enforcement in California", pertained to allegations in the Human Rights Alert report of discrimination by US law enforcement for at least two decades against Los Angeles County, California, through refusal to address overwhelming evidence of racketeering by judges of the Los Angeles Superior Court.<br> Discrimination against a region of the country is a violation of Human Rights, in and of itself, pursuant to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.<br> The Human Rights Alert report to the United Nations provided evidence of such discrimination through conduct of KENNETH KAISER - FBI Assistant Director for Criminal Investigations, and KENNETH MELSON - former Director of US Department of Justice, Office of US Attorneys.<br> Human Rights Alert also provided evidence of patronizing of the conduct of the Los Angeles Superior Court by the United States courts - National Tribunals for Protection of Rights pursuant to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights - from the US District Court, Central District of California, through the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, to the Supreme Court of the United States.<br> Much larger organizations, and even Joint Reports of consortia of Human Rights organizations got no mention at all in the HRC report.<br> The HRC report was issued as part of the UPR process, established in 2006 by the General Assembly of the United Nations.<br> In April 2010, over 100 organizations filed stakeholders' reports as part of the first ever review of Human Rights in the United States.<br> In August 2010 the US State Department filed its response. Albeit, the State Department report simply ignored the reports of stakeholders and the HRC staff, and was largely self-congratulatory.<br> Review session regarding Human Rights in the United States is scheduled for November 5, 2010 in Geneva, Switzerland.<br> In its report, Human Rights Alert called upon the US Congress to enact Federal Rules for Public Access to Electronic Court Record, Case Management, and Electronic Court Fling (PACER & CM/ECF), as quinessential for restoration of integrity of banking regulation and the courts in the United States, for restoration of the Rule of Law, and for the safeguard of Human Rights in the digital era. [2] [3]<br> Human Rights Alert (NGO) is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system.<br> LINKS<br> [1] 10-01-10 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States:<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/"><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/</a></a><br> [2] Peer-reviewed paper published by Dr Zernik, opining fraud in the electronic prisoners' registration system of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department:<br> 10-08-18 Zernik, J: Data Mining as a Civic Duty – Online Public Prisoners’ Registration Systems, International Journal on Social Media: Monitoring, Measurement, Mining 1: 84-96 (2010)<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/38328591/"><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/38328591/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/38328591/</a></a><br> [3] Peer-reviewed paper published by Dr Zernik, opining fraud in the online public access and electronic case management systems of the United States courts (PACER & CM/ECF):<br> 10-08-18 Zernik, J: Data Mining of Online Judicial Records of the Networked US Federal Courts, International Journal on Social Media: Monitoring, Measurement, Mining, 1:69-83 (2010)<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/38328585/"><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/38328585/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/38328585/</a></a> </p> <p> <small> <a href="http://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/10/03/10-10-02-corruption-of-the-courts-the-legal-profession-and-law-enforcement-in-los-angeles-county-california-was-noted-by-the-united-nations-9507774/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p> judicial-corruptionhttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/10/03/10-10-02-corruption-of-the-courts-the-legal-profession-and-law-enforcement-in-los-angeles-county-california-was-noted-by-the-united-nations-9507774/#commentshttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/30/10-08-30-fraud-opined-in-case-management-and-online-public-access-systems-of-the-us-courts-9277092/tag:josephzernik.blog.co.uk,2010-08-30:/2010/08/30/10-08-30-fraud-opined-in-case-management-and-online-public-access-systems-of-the-us-courts-9277092/Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:30:02 +0200 <p><img src="http://api.ning.com/files/cbKNVk-QIzZIzecdgeqmlNXZ8fh1CvyWUipmHGbHiCNUDpvYX5ee5CNuvI4PgPZIlGbBXBxq4mYj64p3Jm-Knfs1yBK-0V7H/leahy.jpg" alt="" title=""><br> <em>Patrick Leahy - Chair, US Senate Judiciary Committee</em><br> <strong>Fraud Opined in Case Management and Online Public Access Systems of the US Courts<br> An Urgent Call of Legislative Action</strong><br> Los Angeles, August 30 - Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, submitted paper for peer-review and consideration for publication in top-tier law journals, opining large-scale fraud in case management and online public access systems of the courts in the United States. Digital voting machines were previously shown to be vulnerable to malfunction and malfeasance. Likewise, the current study outlined conditions of digital case management and online public access systems that govern the courts, jails, and prisons in the United States and documented large-scale abuse of such systems.<br> Material deficiencies were identified in all systems, which were examined. Such systems enabled the holding of prisoners under pretense of lawfulness, the conduct of pretense court proceedings, and the issuance of invalid court records as part of pretense of judicial review. Invalid case management and online public access systems were described, which enable collusion between judges and large financial institutions in pretense court proceedings, which undermined any prospect of effective banking regulation in the United States.<br> Moreover, a "chain reaction" effect was documented, where the US courts, up to the Supreme Court of the United States, engaged in pretense review of cases originating from pretense actions of the California Superior Court, County of Los Angeles.<br> Corrective actions were outlined, which were urgently needed - comprehensive review and the establishment of publicly and legally accountable validation of all case management and online public access systems at the courts, jails, and prisons.<br> The paper further called for restoration of public access to judicial records, which were now concealed in case management systems of the courts, in apparent violation of First Amendment rights. The paper further claimed that only upon restoration of public access to such records, the full scope of judicial misconduct in the United States would be exposed. Therefore, the paper also called for the establishment of Truth and Reconciliation Commission - for review of conduct of the judiciary in the United States. Patrick Leahy, Chair of the Senate's Judiciary Committee previously proposed the establishment of such commission for review of conduct of the US Department of Justice.<br> The paper opined that such actions were likely to affect restoration of effective banking regulation, access to the courts, the rule of law, and the safeguard of Human Rights in the digital era.<br> Two pervious papers, peer-reviewed and pending publication by international computer science journals opined fraud in the Los Angels County, California, Sheriff's Department "Inmate Information Center" - the online public access system - which enabled unlawful imprisonments, [1] and in PACER & CM/ECF - case management and public access system of the US District Court, Central District of California - which enabled the conduct of pretense court actions. [2]<br> Expert opinion previously issued by an international Computer Science expert, based on manuscripts authored by Dr Zernik, which analyzed Sustain - the case management system of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, stated "credible evidence" of "fraud" and called for review of the system by US-based Computer Science experts. [3]<br> Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States.<br> <strong>Key Words</strong><br> Liberty, Access to the Courts, Human Rights, Rule of Law, Fraud, United States Courts, Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, Digital Signatures, Relational Databases, Functional Logic Verification, Case Management Systems, Online Public Access Systems, Prisoners' Registration<br> <strong>LINKS</strong><br> [1] A peer-reviewed paper, opining fraud in the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department "Inmate Information Center":<br> Data Mining as a Civic Duty - Online Public Prisoners Registration Systems - pending publication, SONET2010<br> <a href="http://inproperinla.com/10-08-18-sonet2010-zernik-1-prisons-pending-publication-s.pdf">http://inproperinla.com/10-08-18-sonet2010-zernik-1-prisons-pending-publication-s.pdf</a><br> [2] A peer-reviewed paper, opining fraud in PACER & CM/ECF at the US District Court, Central District of California:<br> Data Mining of Online Judicial Records of the Networked US Federal Courts<br> <a href="http://inproperinla.com/10-08-18-sonet2010-zernik-2-courts-pending-publication-s.pdf">http://inproperinla.com/10-08-18-sonet2010-zernik-2-courts-pending-publication-s.pdf</a><br> [3] Qualified opinion of Prof Eli Shamir, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, regarding fraud in Sustain - case management system of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles:<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/30454036/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/30454036/</a> </p> <p> <small> <a href="http://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/30/10-08-30-fraud-opined-in-case-management-and-online-public-access-systems-of-the-us-courts-9277092/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p> united-states-courtsjudicial-corruptionhttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/30/10-08-30-fraud-opined-in-case-management-and-online-public-access-systems-of-the-us-courts-9277092/#commentshttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/27/10-08-27-re-richard-fine-request-for-restoration-of-access-to-justice-filed-with-laurence-tribe-senior-counsel-usdoj-9264643/tag:josephzernik.blog.co.uk,2010-08-27:/2010/08/27/10-08-27-re-richard-fine-request-for-restoration-of-access-to-justice-filed-with-laurence-tribe-senior-counsel-usdoj-9264643/Fri, 27 Aug 2010 23:04:29 +0200 <p><img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_4QooSf0l1yE/THgm4C_QDOI/AAAAAAAABpA/Oyg20BuIEZg/s320/tribe.jpg" alt="" title=""> <img src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_4QooSf0l1yE/THgm9E8v0HI/AAAAAAAABpI/jGrcdsK89uI/s320/Fine+2.jpg" alt="" title=""><br> Laurence Tribe Richard Fine</p> <p><strong>10-08-27 RE: Richard Fine - request for restoration of access to justice, and for corrective actions re: publicly and legally accountable validation of case management and online public access systems of the courts, jails, and prisons</strong><br> <em><strong>Executive Summary </strong></em><br> August 27 – request [1] was filed by Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, for restoration of access to justice in the case of the imprisoned, 70 year-old, former US prosecutor Richard Fine. The request was filed with Prof Laurence Tribe - Senior Counsel, US Department Of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative. </p> <p>Richard Fine, had exposed, publicized, and rebuked the taking by California judges in Los Angeles County of "not permitted" payments (called by media "bribes"). On February 20, 2009, the Governor of California signed "retroactive immunities" (“pardons”) for all judges in Los Angeles County, California. </p> <p>Less than two weeks later, on March 4, 2009, “Sentencing Proceeding” for contempt was conducted on Richard Fine at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, which was never validly recorded by the Court. Instead, the Court published false and deliberately misleading online records. The request claimed that the March 4, 2009 “Sentencing Proceeding” was only a pretense, which was never deemed a valid court proceeding by the Court itself.</p> <p>On March 4, 2010, Richard Fine was arrested in open court by the Warrant Detail of Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department – albeit with no warrant at all. Richard Fine has been held ever since in solitary confinement – albeit no judgment/conviction, or sentencing was ever entered in his case. Instead, the Sheriff’s Department insisted on holding him under false and deliberately misleading online inmate registration records, stating that he was arrested and booked on location and by authority of the non-existent “Municipal Court of San Pedro”.</p> <p>The request detailed Richard Fine’s attempts to have his habeas corpus reviewed by the United States courts, from the US District Court – Central District of California, through the US Court of Appeals – 9th Circuit, to the Supreme Court of the United States. In all United States courts involved, no valid judicial records were ever entered by the courts. Court minutes, judgments, mandate, decisions were either not signed by the judges and/or not authenticated by the clerks of the respective courts. Concomitantly, false and deliberately misleading dockets were published online by all courts involved, which would lead a reasonable person to conclude that Richard Fine’s case was indeed accorded valid judicial review, and that his petitions, appeal, and applications to the various US courts were duly denied. Therefore, the request claimed that Richard Fine was denied access to justice, and was instead subjected only to pretense judicial review at the US courts – National Tribunals for Protection of Rights.</p> <p>The request further provided documentation and/or expert opinions regarding the inherent invalidity of case management and online public access systems of all courts involved, as well as the Sheriff’s Department. Such systems enabled the holding of prisoners under pretense of lawfulness, the conduct of pretense court proceedings, and the issuance of invalid court records, as part of pretense of judicial review:<br> a) Online public dockets were implemented at the courts, where the authority of the clerk was never invoked, and where the clerks were unaccountable for validity of the records;<br> b) Online prisoners’ registration systems were implemented in the jails, where authority of record supervisors was never invoked, and where records supervisors were unaccountable for validity of the records;<br> c) All agencies involved in the matter published online false and misleading records, while public access to public records was denied, and<br> d) All courts, which were inspected, failed to publish local rules, establishing procedures governing the implementation, validation, and use of case management and online public access systems at the courts.</p> <p>Senior Counsel Laurence Tribe was requested to accord due process in acceptance, review, and response on the request for restoration of Richard Fine’s access to justice. With it, Senior Counsel Laurence Tribe was requested to initiate corrective actions through comprehensive review and publicly and legally accountable validation of all case management and online public access systems at the courts, jails, and prisons. </p> <p>The request claimed that any action by Senior Counsel Laurence Tribe to affect the restoration of Richard Fine’s access to justice and to establish by law the validation of case management and online public access systems of the courts, would affect substantial impact on restoration of access to justice in the United States, the rule of law in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond, and the safeguard of Human Rights in the digital era.</p> <p>Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice system in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management and online public access systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the courts and Human Rights in the United States.</p> <p><strong>LINKS:<br> [1]</strong> 10-08-27 Request for Restoration of Access to Justice Filed With Senior Counsel Laurence Tribe in re: Richard Fine s<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/36516113/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/36516113/</a> </p> <p> <small> <a href="http://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/27/10-08-27-re-richard-fine-request-for-restoration-of-access-to-justice-filed-with-laurence-tribe-senior-counsel-usdoj-9264643/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p> judicial-corruptionfalse-imprisonmentslos-angeles-countycaliforniahttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/27/10-08-27-re-richard-fine-request-for-restoration-of-access-to-justice-filed-with-laurence-tribe-senior-counsel-usdoj-9264643/#commentshttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/23/10-08-22-letter-to-prof-laurence-tribe-practical-overview-the-alleged-los-angeles-judiciary-racket-la-jr-and-failure-of-us-banking-regulation-9230393/tag:josephzernik.blog.co.uk,2010-08-23:/2010/08/23/10-08-22-letter-to-prof-laurence-tribe-practical-overview-the-alleged-los-angeles-judiciary-racket-la-jr-and-failure-of-us-banking-regulation-9230393/Mon, 23 Aug 2010 22:05:29 +0200 <p><strong>10-08-22 Letter to Prof Laurence Tribe: PRACTICAL OVERVIEW: The alleged Los Angeles Judiciary Racket (LA-JR) and failure of US banking regulation<br> </strong><br> <img src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_4QooSf0l1yE/THLSUcp6j5I/AAAAAAAABo4/qsWyZj0uNy8/s320/tribe.jpg" alt="" title=""><br> <em>Laurence Tribe<br> Harvard Law Professor<br> Special Counsel<br> US Department of Justice</em></p> <p><strong>RE: PRACTICAL OVERVIEW:<br> The alleged Los Angeles Judiciary Racket (LA-JR) and failure of US banking regulation</strong></p> <p>Prof Laurence Tribe<br> Senior Counsel<br> Access to Justice Initiative<br> US Department of Justice</p> <p>Dear Prof Tribe:</p> <p>In case you have no time to review the records attached to my complaints, previously filed with your office, and to study the history of the LA-JR over past decades, you may find the following Practical Overview a helpful guide.</p> <p>The Overview was originally written in response to comment by an online reader, who blamed today's Attorney General ERIC HOLDER for conditions now prevailing in Los Angeles County, California. Needless to say, the problem is decades old.</p> <p>The Overview emphasizes the transition of the court and financial institutions into the digital era, and failure of the US government to adequately manage the transition, as key to accelerated breakdown of lawful government frameworks.</p> <p>I would be glad to provide you detailed evidence in support of the statements below.</p> <p>Truly,</p> <p>Joseph Zernik, PhD<br> Human Rights Alert (NGO)</p> <p>CC:<br> 1) United Nations Human Rights Council<br> 2) Basel Accords Committee<br> 3) US Congress Banking and Judiciary Committees<br> ________________</p> <p>A PRACTICAL OVERVIEW<br> The Alleged Los Angeles Judiciary Racket (LA-JR) and Failure of US Banking Regulation</p> <p>GENERAL<br> The following is not intended as advocacy for US Attorney General ERIC HOLDER. However, one must realize that problem is decades old, and confronting the LA-JR and failing US banking regulation is a tall order.</p> <p>The LA-JR controls the largest county court in the United States (~600 judges and commissioners), and the most populous county in the country (>10 millions residents), which according to FBI brought us, and the world at large, the current financial crisis. Already in the early 2000s, FBI reports concluded that Los Angeles County was "The epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud, which is a high national priority to fight".</p> <p>The direct links between top management at Countrywide Financial Corporation (CFC), which triggered the current crisis and the LA-JR are fully documented below. [1] The direct links between the LA-JR and Brian Moynihan, President of Bank of America Corporation (BAC) - CFC successor, are likewise documented below. [1]<br> A. KEY EVENTS IN EVOLUTION OF THE LA-JR AND BREAKDOWN OF US BANKING REGULATION (1980-2010)<br> 1) IRAN CONTRA SCANDAL - ~1982-1992CIA and FBI were involved in wholesale drug trafficking, where the target was Los Angeles County, California. One aspect of the scandal, which was entirely overlooked in the 1997 US Department of Justice Special Report in the matter, was any discussion of the outcome - collusion by federal and local justice system agencies in large-scale violations of the law. It is claimed that the Iran-Contra Scandal created conditions, which compromised any prospect of rule of law in Los Angeles County, California, for decades to come.</p> <p>2) SUSTAIN ~1985SUSTAIN and other computerized case management systems at the Los Angeles Superior Court are deemed invalid. Main features of the systems are similar to those listed below under PACER & CM/ECF.<br> The Los Angeles Superior Court was at the forefront of installation of case management systems, which led to further precipitous deterioration in integrity of the courts. Such systems are deemed the enabling tools of the LA-JR in its current manifestation in both the civil and criminal divisions. The systems were installed during the tenure of today's California Chief Justice RONALD GEORGE in leadership positions at the Los Angeles courts.<br> SUSTAIN, which is now used also in other state courts in the United States, was developed and is maintained by the Los Angeles County based DAILY JOURNAL - the largest legal newspaper in California.</p> <p>3) COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION (CFC) ~1990s-2000s The evidence is overwhelming of evolution of Los Angeles County-based CFC into a corrupt organization, and the tight collusion between CFC and the LA-JR. [1] It is claimed that CFC would not have evolved the way it did, absent the infrastructure of the justice system in Los Angeles County, California.</p> <p>4) RAMPART SCANDAL INVESTIGATION - 1998-2000 Large-scale corruption of the courts and large-scale false imprisonments were covered up by US agencies, by permitting the local Los Angeles County agencies to investigate, prosecute, and adjudicate their own corruption.</p> <p>5) LOS ANGELES OFFICE OF OVERSEER FOR CIVIL RIGHTS - 2001-2009Operation of the Office under US Judge GARY FEESS must be deemed upon review as further cover up of massive corruption.</p> <p>6) PACER & CM/ECF - 2000sThe online public access and case management systems of the US courts are deemed invalid, as detailed in a paper, peer-reviewed by an international, academic, computer science conference. [2] The systems enabled the conduct of pretense litigations and the online publication in PACER of pretense minutes, orders, and judgments of the courts.<br> All US district courts and US Courts of Appeals, which were examined, without exception:<br> a) Failed to publish Local Rules of Court, detailing the nature of valid signatures by judges and by clerks in the system.<br> b) Employed the systems to curtail public access to court records, in apparent violation of the common law right to access court records - to inspect and to copy, which was re-affirmed by the US Supreme Court as First Amendment right in Nixon v Warner Communications, Inc(1978). The most common documents, which are hidden from public access, are the NEFs (Notices of Electronic Filing) - which the courts deem today as authentication/attestation by the Clerk.<br> c) Implemented authentication/attestation records (NEFs/NDAs), which must be deemed invalid on their faces, as to form.<br> Combined, the defects listed in a)-c), above, inherently undermined the central role of the Clerk of the Court as an accountable check and balance in the safeguard of integrity of the courts.</p> <p>7) E-SIGN ACT - 2002 It is claimed that the law, as enacted, and failure/inability of US government to promulgate the law, left the nature of signatures largely undefined in the digital era. Such conditions are claimed as central in deterioration of integrity of both the courts and financial institutions.</p> <p>8) COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION (CFC) COLLAPSE - 2008<br> The collapse of CFC in January 2008 ushered in the current financial crisis. The US directed merger of CFC with BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION (BAC) must be deemed upon review incomprehensible.<br> Contrary to the current focus on investigation of events related to the coerced merger of BAC with MERRILL LYNCH, the earlier merger of BAC and CFC should be the focus of attention. Refusal of US agencies and senior US officers to liquidate CFC, and the forced merger of CFC with BAC led the evolution of BAC into a corrupt organization, with fully documented, direct links to the LA-JR. [1]</p> <p>B. KEY PATRONIZERS OF THE LA-JR:<br> 1) Some, but not all at the US DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, including, but not limited to:<br> CARLA WOEHRLE - US Magistrate;<br> VIRGINIA PHILLIPS - US Judge;<br> JOHN WALTER - US Judge;<br> AUDREY COLLINS - Chief Judge;<br> TERRI NAFISI - Clerk of the Court.</p> <p>2) Some, but not all at the US COURT OF APPEALS, 9TH CIRCUIT, including, but not limited to:<br> ALEX KOZINSKI - Chief Judge<br> RICHARD PAEZ - Circuit Judge<br> RICHARD TALLMAN - Circuit Judge<br> MARY M SCHROEDER - Circuit Judge<br> ANDREW KLEINFELD - Circuit Judge<br> A WALLACE TASHIMA - Circuit Judge<br> N.R. SMITH - Circuit Judge<br> STEPHEN REINHARDT - Circuit Judge<br> STEPHEN S TROTT - Circuit Judge<br> KIM M WARDLAW - Circuit Judge<br> MOLLY DWYER - Clerk of Court</p> <p>3) Some, but not all at the US Supreme Court, including, but not limited to:<br> WILLIAM SUTER - Clerk of the Court<br> DANNY BICKELL - Court Counsel</p> <p>4) US ATTORNEY OFFICE & FBI BRANCHES, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA;</p> <p>5) ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS - former US Attorney, Central District of California (today Director of US Department of Justice Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services);</p> <p>6) KENNETH KAISER - Assistant Director of FBI for Criminal Investigations;</p> <p>7) KENNETH MELSON - former Director of US Attorneys Office at US Department of Justice (today Director of US Department of Justice Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives);</p> <p>8) GLENN A FINE - US Department of Justice Inspector General.</p> <p>In contrast, you would find US Senator DIANNE FEINSTEIN fighting for over a decade to compel the US Attorney Office to institute effectual Public Corruption and Civil Rights Division in southern California, and US Representative DIANE WATSON a strong supporter of the cause.<br> <strong>LINKS</strong><br> <strong>[1]</strong> July 11, 2010 complaint filed with SEC and US Controller of the Currency, alleging racketeering by Bank of America Corporation and its President Brian Moynihan at the Los Angeles, California Courts:<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/32907453/"><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/32907453/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/32907453/</a></a><br> <strong>[2]</strong> Data Mining of Online Judicial Records of the Networked US Federal Courts<br> <a href="http://inproperinla.com/10-08-18-sonet2010-zernik-2-courts-pending-publication-s.pdf"><a href="http://inproperinla.com/10-08-18-sonet2010-zernik-2-courts-pending-publication-s.pdf">http://inproperinla.com/10-08-18-sonet2010-zernik-2-courts-pending-publication-s.pdf</a></a><br> <img src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_4QooSf0l1yE/S7GNMg5PW6I/AAAAAAAABRQ/sdbzbE4EqpM/S1600-R/HRA+Logo.jpg" alt="" title=""><br> Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States.<br> <img src="http://www3.clustrmaps.com/counter/index2.php?url=http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/" alt="" title=""><br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert"><a href="http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert">http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert</a></a> </p> <p> <small> <a href="http://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/23/10-08-22-letter-to-prof-laurence-tribe-practical-overview-the-alleged-los-angeles-judiciary-racket-la-jr-and-failure-of-us-banking-regulation-9230393/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p> los-angeles-countyjudicial-corruptioncaliforniafalse-imprisonmentshttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/23/10-08-22-letter-to-prof-laurence-tribe-practical-overview-the-alleged-los-angeles-judiciary-racket-la-jr-and-failure-of-us-banking-regulation-9230393/#commentshttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/22/10-08-22-racketeering-complaint-against-la-superior-court-judges-patricia-collins-lisa-hart-cole-others-9225100/tag:josephzernik.blog.co.uk,2010-08-22:/2010/08/22/10-08-22-racketeering-complaint-against-la-superior-court-judges-patricia-collins-lisa-hart-cole-others-9225100/Sun, 22 Aug 2010 23:51:22 +0200 <p><img src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_4QooSf0l1yE/THGZyHdVupI/AAAAAAAABow/rO3zeHX3Q7c/s320/HART-COLE.jpg" alt="" title=""><br> <em>Judge Lisa Hart-Cole<br> Los Angeles Superior Court</em><br> <strong>10-08-22 RE: SC087400- Complaint against then Judge Patricia Collins, Judge Lisa Hart-Cole, Attorney David Pasternak, Old Republic International (NYSE:ORI) and others - for public corruption and racketeering by judges, financial institutions, and large law-firms in pretense proceedings at the Court.</strong></p> <p>Los Angles, August 22 – complaint [1] was filed with US Attorney Office, Central District of California, and Prof Laurence Tribe - Senior Counsel, US Department Of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, by Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, against former Judge Patricia Collins, Judge Lisa Hart-Cole, Attorney David Pasternak, Old Republic International (NYSE:ORI), and Attorney Richard Ormond (Buchalter Nemer, LLP) - for public corruption and racketeering in pretense proceedings at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. Others named as accused in the complaint were Judge Jacqueline Connor, Presiding Judge Charles McCoy,Judge in Charge of Writs and Receiverships David Yaffe, Clerk of the Court John A Clarke, and Court Counsel Fredrick Bennett, who were all alleged as central figures in conduct of a racketeering enterprise at the Court.<br> In early December 2007, Attorney David Pasternak, acting as pretense “Receiver” on behalf of the Court under Samaan v Zernik (SC087400), was perpetrating real estate fraud, as later opined by highly-decorated FBI veteran, fraud expert James Wedick. Target of the fraud was Beverly Hills property of Complainant Zernik. Judge Jacqueline Connor had instigated the scheme two years earlier.<br> To accomplish the fraud, collusion by Mara Escrow, a subsidiary of ORI – a large financial institution, was required. However, Complainant alerted Mara’s Senior Escrow Officer Liz Cohen that she was about to perpetrate real estate fraud. Therefore, Ms Cohen refused to collude with Attorney Pasternak and the Court.<br> On December 7, 2007, to overcome the hurdles, Attorney David Pasternak and others engaged in two pretense “Ex Parte Proceedings” in two separate courthouses on the same morning:<br> 1) In the first “Ex Parte Proceeding”, at the Beverly Hills Courthouse, Attorney David Pasternak, acting as pretense “Receiver” - with no valid and effectual Appointment Order, and Attorney Richard Ormond, on behalf of Mara Escrow, appeared before Judge Lisa Hart-Cole to request Court approval of various documents, never previously seen by Complainant, including, but not limited to:<br> a. “Grant Deeds”, which were later opined as “fraud”;<br> b. “Indemnity Agreement” for Mara Escrow – for future criminalities, and<br> c. Gag Orders – to prohibit pro se Defendant from speech in defense of self with escrow or with the title company, who were conspiring with Attorney Pasternak, the Court, and others to commit real estate fraud.<br> At the onset, Defendant filed a Peremptory Challenge with Judge Hart-Cole. In the proceeding that ensued, both Judge Hart-Cole and Attorney Richard Ormond refused to disclose the name of the latter, or the identity of the party, which he represented in Court in the proceeding.<br> Consequently, Judge Hart-Cole issued Minutes of Recusal. However, later she secretly “disposed” of the Minutes in Sustain - the Court’s case management system, effectively eliminating the proceeding from the record.<br> 2) In the second “Ex Parte Proceeding”, at the Santa Monica Courthouse, Judge Patricia Collins introduced Attorney Pasternak as an “Ad Hoc Receiver”. In response to then Defendant Zernik’s objections for abuse of Free Speech and Possession rights in such “Ex Parte Proceeding”, Attorney Pasternak justified the need for the proceeding in his shortage of funds. Judge Collins then pretended in open court to approve Attorney Pasternak’s requests. However, Judge Collins secretly created for the proceeding void registration and void Minutes in Sustain – with no certification by Clerk.<br> Consequently, on December 17, 2007, Attorney Pasternak concluded the fraud in conveyance of title on the property. However, the fraud in conduct ofSamaan v Zernik continues to this date – the case continues to be listed as “Pending” – since no Judgment was ever entered in the case.<br> The complaint alleged that the mere notion of conducting such proceedings at the Court reflected the impunity of the enterprise.<br> Pretense “Receiverships” by Attorney Pasternak in other cases at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, were documented in complaints previously filed with the US Attorney Office. The scheme was claimed as part of the larger enterprise, founded in the conduct of pretense proceedings and issuing of pretense minutes, pretense orders, and pretense judgments. Sustain, the case management system of the Court, was alleged as the enabling tool of the racket.<br> The complaint, was claimed of high public policy significance, since David Pasternak, who was alleged in a series of complaints as a central figure in the enterprise, was former President of the Los Angeles County Bar Association, former Member of the California Judicial Council, and former President of Bet Tzedek (“The House of Justice”) – a prominent Los Angeles Jewish/legal charity. Therefore, the complaint alleged that his conduct reflected widespread public corruption of both the California courts and the legal profession.<br> Moreover, the complaint alleged that conduct of Samaan v Zernik was unique in documenting conditions, where the Los Angeles Superior Court was not only permissive and conducive, but also coercive of criminalities by financial institutions. The complaint alleged such conditions - collusion of judges, large financial institutions, and large law-firms in an enterprise - undermined any prospect of establishing effective banking regulation in the United States.<br> The complaint quoted the official Blue Ribbon Review Panel (2006), which concluded that the Los Angeles Superior Court “must be investigated”, and highly decorated FBI veteran, Fraud Expert James Wedick, who opined (2008) “investigation should be immediately instituted”, as well as Congressional Inquiries on FBI and US Department of Justice by the Hon Dianne Feinstein, Senator, (2008, 2010) and the Hon Diane Watson, Congresswoman, (2008) in related matters. Complainant asked the US Department of Justice to institute such investigation and accord equal protection to all 10 million residents of Los Angeles County, California.<br> Judges were previously prosecuted for racketeering in San Jose and San Diego, California, and in Cook County, Illinois. Judges are today prosecuted for racketeering in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania. Judges are also prosecuted in El Paso Texas, and large-scale corruption of the courts and the legal profession is under investigation in Florida. Senior Counsel Laurence Tribe recently warned of deteriorating conditions at the state courts in the US, comparing them to those of “third world” nations.<br> Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice system in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management and online public access systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the courts in the United States.<br> <strong>LINKS<br> [1]</strong> Complaint<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/36266839">http://www.scribd.com/doc/36266839</a> </p> <p> <small> <a href="http://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/22/10-08-22-racketeering-complaint-against-la-superior-court-judges-patricia-collins-lisa-hart-cole-others-9225100/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p> false-imprisonmentscaliforniajudicial-corruptionlos-angeles-countyhttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/22/10-08-22-racketeering-complaint-against-la-superior-court-judges-patricia-collins-lisa-hart-cole-others-9225100/#commentshttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/21/10-08-20-please-sign-the-petition-human-rights-in-the-united-states-9219921/tag:josephzernik.blog.co.uk,2010-08-21:/2010/08/21/10-08-20-please-sign-the-petition-human-rights-in-the-united-states-9219921/Sat, 21 Aug 2010 21:37:27 +0200 <p><img src="http://www.petitionspot.com/cache/gimages/85239-4.jpg" alt="" title=""><br> <strong>Calling upon the UN Human Rights Council to issue an honest and effectual 2010 Report on the US justice system and Human Rights in the United States</strong></p> <p>We, the undersigned, who live in the United States and elsewhere, call upon the Human Rights Council of the United Nations to engage in a thorough review of the justice system in the United States as part of the first ever - November 2010 - UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States.</p> <p>We call upon the Human Rights Council to issue in November 2010 an honest and effectual UPR Report, calling upon the United States to take effective measures to restore integrity of its judiciary and its justice system.</p> <p>Conditions now prevailing in the United States amount to large scale abuse of the people by the government of the United States. Moreover, such conditions pose risks that are difficult to assess to world peace and welfare. </p> <p>Such conditions were documented in both state and United States courts, be it civil, criminal, bankruptcy, or family courts.</p> <p>Reports, which were filed by stakeholders as part of the UPR process, provided evidence of widespread corruption of the justice system in the United States:<br> ...<br> <a href="http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/ushumanrights/"><a href="http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/ushumanrights/">http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/ushumanrights/</a></a> </p> <p> <small> <a href="http://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/21/10-08-20-please-sign-the-petition-human-rights-in-the-united-states-9219921/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p> human-rightsunited-statesuprunited-nationshttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/21/10-08-20-please-sign-the-petition-human-rights-in-the-united-states-9219921/#commentshttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/18/10-08-18-bellflower-judge-runs-amok-9203245/tag:josephzernik.blog.co.uk,2010-08-18:/2010/08/18/10-08-18-bellflower-judge-runs-amok-9203245/Wed, 18 Aug 2010 20:36:36 +0200 <p>Additional evidence of alleged collusion by judges and financial institutions in racketeering in real estate matters at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles.<br> .<br> Please sign the petition:<br> Calling upon the UN Human Rights Council to issue an honest and effectual 2010 Report on the US justice system and Human Rights in the United States.<br> <img src="http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/calling-upon-the-un-human-rights-council-to-issue-an-honest-and-effectual-2010-report-on-the-us/" alt="" title=""></p> <p>_______________________________________________<br> <img src="http://www.smartvoter.org/2006/06/06/ca/la/vote/sanchez_dl/sanchez_dl.jpg" alt="" title=""><br> <em>Deborah L. Sanchez,Judge<br> Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles</em><br> <strong>BELLFLOWER JUDGE RUNS AMOK<br> </strong><br> On August 17, 2010 Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Deborah Sanchez, in the Bellflower Courthouse Dept. 2, decided she didn't have to obey either a Bankruptcy Court Stay or the laws on Disqualification of a Judge.</p> <p>In post-foreclosure Unlawful Detainer case #09C03210, Shepard Investments v James Krage, Judge Sanchez decided she herself could assume federal jurisdiction and rule on the validity of a Bankruptcy Stay that was issued on December 23, 2010 and that the Bankruptcy Court had ruled to still be in effect.</p> <p>When Defendant Krage questioned her right to rule on the Federal question by Disqualifying Judge Sanchez for Bias and Prejudice, Judge Sanchez ignored the Procedures proscribed by law (Code of Civil Procedures 170.1 and 170.3) and Ordered her own Disqualification stricken, instead of letting an independent Judge rule on it, as prescribed by law.</p> <p>Plaintiff Shepard Investments Inc had previously lost 3 tries in Bankruptcy Court to get Relief from the Stay, so they convinced the local judge to make a federal decision and give them a Writ of Possession.</p> <p>Shepard Investments is a renegade Foreclosure Auction purchaser that has violated the law many times to get quick possession of homes they bought at foreclosure auctions. </p> <p>Defendant Krage successfully forced Shepard Investments to dismiss 2 previous Unlawful Detainers, because 1) they didn't timely file the Trustee's Deed Upon Sale, and 2) they bought the property under a Fictitious Business name (Summer Creek Homes) that they hadn't renewed in 4 years.</p> <p>Most Unlawful Detainers that Shepard Investments have won could be overturned with either violation, and both violations occurred in over 50 post-foreclosure Unlawful Detainer cases.<br> The main points here are that a California Judge should not assume Federal Jurisdiction to rule on the validity of a Federal Bankruptcy Stay, and that a Judge should not rule on her own Disqualification for Allegations of Bias and Prejudice. Only Federal Judges can rule on the validity of a Stay, and State Judges are not allowed to rule on their own Disqualification, but rather must have the Disqualification Allegations heard by an independent Judge, as required by law. </p> <p> <small> <a href="http://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/18/10-08-18-bellflower-judge-runs-amok-9203245/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p> los-angeles-countyfinancial-institutionscaliforniajudicial-corruptionhttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/18/10-08-18-bellflower-judge-runs-amok-9203245/#commentshttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/15/10-08-14-petition-launched-calling-the-un-to-issue-honest-and-effectual-report-on-the-us-justice-system-human-rights-in-the-united-states-9182829/tag:josephzernik.blog.co.uk,2010-08-15:/2010/08/15/10-08-14-petition-launched-calling-the-un-to-issue-honest-and-effectual-report-on-the-us-justice-system-human-rights-in-the-united-states-9182829/Sun, 15 Aug 2010 10:20:19 +0200 <p><img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_4QooSf0l1yE/TGehrzLG8hI/AAAAAAAABoo/8H3reNFR170/s320/UN+Human+Rights+Council.jpg" alt="" title=""><br> Los Angeles, August 14 – Human Rights Alert (NGO) launched an online petition, calling upon the Human Rights Council of the United Nations (UN) to engage in a thorough review of the justice system in the United States as part of the first ever - November 2010 - UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States, The petition further called upon the UN to issue in November 2010 an honest and effectual UPR Report, asking the United States to take effective measures to restore integrity of its judiciary and its justice system.<br> The petition stated that conditions now prevailing in the United States amounted to large-scale abuse of the people by the government of the United States. Moreover, such conditions posed risks that were difficult to assess to world peace and welfare.<br> The petition cited conditions, which were documented in both state and United States courts, be it civil, criminal, bankruptcy, or family courts, and which were documented in reports filed by stakeholders as part of the UPR process, providing evidence of widespread corruption of the justice system in the United States:<br> · Executions continue, at times, as the outcome of judicial conduct that would be deemed unreasonable by any reasonable person.<br> · Torture was allowed to become part of government conduct, and confessions extracted through torture were admitted in courts.<br> · With privatized, for profit prisons, the United States holds a prisoner population that is entirely out of proportion with any other developed, democratic nation; Minorities are imprisoned in vastly disproportionate numbers.<br> · Large-scale false imprisonment of juvenile was exposed in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, as part of the Kids for Cash scandal, and is yet to be fully corrected; Large-scale false imprisonments were exposed in Los Angeles County, California, as part of the Rampart scandal a decade ago, which the US government is refusing to correct.<br> · Regardless of United States government promises, detentions in Guantanamo Bay were never brought to an end; Proceedings, which such detainees were subjected to, violate international conventions.<br> · Attorneys, who represented clients in civil rights matters, or in causes that were not favored by government or by judges, suffered harsh retaliation, or even imprisonment.<br> · Whistleblowers were routinely subjected to harsh retaliations, while the perpetrators - be it government officials, large corporations, or others, suffered no consequence at all.<br> · Racketeering by judges in the United States was and is prosecuted in some courts, but in other cases, even when exposed with indisputable evidence, the United States government refused to take action.<br> · Large banks and financial institutions colluded with judges in looting of homeowners across the United States under the current financial crisis; Even when fraud in the courts by financial institutions and law-firms was exposed and acknowledged by the Courts, such financial institutions and law-firms suffered no consequences at all.<br> · Credible evidence was provided of racketeering by judges, attorneys, and/or judicial officers in receiverships and conservatorships.<br> · Judges, all the way from state courts to the Supreme Court of the United States, introduced the practice of issuing rulings, orders, and judgments, that were not signed by judges and/or were not authenticated/attested by the clerks; Such rulings, orders, and judgments could not possibly be deemed valid court records; They were enforced nevertheless.<br> · Computerized case management and online public access systems were installed in the US and state courts, which effectively denied public access to true and honest court records - to inspect and to copy; Such systems effectively concealed what the courts deem effectual signatures and stamps that were required to set such records honest, valid, and effectual court records.<br> The petition called upon the UN to engage in such review of the justice system of the US, if not for the sake of the safeguard of the Human Rights of the people of the United States, then out of concern with dysfunctional banking regulation in the United States. The petition claimed that there was no way to establish honest and effectual banking and corporate regulation under current conditions at the United States courts today. Reckless conduct by United States banks inflicted harm on workers and investors worldwide. Therefore, an integrity crisis was at the foundation of the current economic depression, and economic conditions were not likely to improve unless integrity of government was restored.</p> <p>LINKS:<br> Please Sign The Petition:<br> Calling Upon the UN Human Rights Council to Issue an Honest and Effectual 2010 Report on the US Justice System and Human Rights in the United States<br> <a href="http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/calling-upon-the-un-human-rights-council-to-issue-an-honest-and-effectual-2010-report-on-the-us/">http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/calling-upon-the-un-human-rights-council-to-issue-an-honest-and-effectual-2010-report-on-the-us/</a><br> <img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_4QooSf0l1yE/TGehkzNqeZI/AAAAAAAABog/G04jj3ORE34/s320/HRA+Logo.jpg" alt="" title=""><br> WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?<br> * "Innocent people remain in prison"* "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."<br> LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/</a><br> * "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."<br> Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/</a><br> * "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."<br> Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/274339">http://www.scribd.com/doc/274339</a> </p> <p> <small> <a href="http://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/15/10-08-14-petition-launched-calling-the-un-to-issue-honest-and-effectual-report-on-the-us-justice-system-human-rights-in-the-united-states-9182829/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p> human-rights-councilunited-states-courtsjudicial-corruptionpetitionhttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/15/10-08-14-petition-launched-calling-the-un-to-issue-honest-and-effectual-report-on-the-us-justice-system-human-rights-in-the-united-states-9182829/#commentshttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/13/10-08-10-torture-confessions-by-guantanamo-child-detainee-allowed-as-evidence-9176784/tag:josephzernik.blog.co.uk,2010-08-13:/2010/08/13/10-08-10-torture-confessions-by-guantanamo-child-detainee-allowed-as-evidence-9176784/Fri, 13 Aug 2010 21:28:57 +0200 <p><img src="http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS49IwP4Sox18GrcbHPc_xM7jPgd0eF77q8lmz8bvmf8X28IRw&t=1&usg=__GS-wQ0Zh-WWIy52zH9QRa-AeXr0=" alt="" title=""><br> <img src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/07/15/timestopics/topics_khadr_190.jpg" alt="" title=""><br> <em>Omar Khadr</em><br> Omar Khadr, a Canadian, was 15 when he was accused in 2002 of killing a United States soldier in Afghanistan during a battle. He was subsequently imprisoned and interrogated in Afghanistan and at the Guantánamo Bay detention center in Cuba, where he is still held.<br> Video footage of his interrogation from February 2003 was released by his lawyers on July 14, 2008. It shows Mr. Khadr pleading with a Canadian intelligence agent for help and, at one point, shows him displaying chest and back wounds that had still not healed months after his capture in Afghanistan.</p> <p>Omar Khadr Navigator<br> A list of resources from around the Web about Omar Khadr as selected by researchers and editors of The New York Times.<br> Military Commission for Omar Khadr<br> U.S. Department of Defense<br> Special Focus: Guantanamo, Omar Ahmed Khadr<br> Human Rights Watch<br> The Omar Khadr Case: A Teenager Imprisoned at Guantanamo<br> Human Rights Watch<br> “Inside the Khadr Family”<br> Frontline, PBS.org<br> OTHER COVERAGE</p> <p>“US Court Weighs Guantanamo Case”<br> BBC.com, Aug. 24, 2007<br> Timeline: In Depth Khadr<br> Canadian Broadcasting Corporation News, updated July 15, 2008<br> VIDEO</p> <p>60 minutes Report on Omar Khadr<br> BOOKS</p> <p>Guantanamo’s Child<br> By Michelle Shephard (2008)<br> The commission has already ruled that confessions made by Khadr which were clearly... statements Khadr made to interrogators because of torture and other abuse. .....Ross Douthat uses his New York Times column today to put what he ...<br> <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/index.html">www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/index.html</a><br> 'Torture' Confessions Allowed<br> By Al Jazeera<br> The confessions of Omar Khadr, a Canadian citizen charged with terrorism, can be used as evidence in his trial, even though they may have been obtained through torture, a US military judge has ruled. </p> <p><a href="http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article26122.htm">http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article26122.htm</a><br> Gitmo Trial Puts White House In Tight Spot<br> By Michael Isikoff National investigative correspondent<br> Top U.N. official calls defendant a 'child soldier,' says proceedings violate international legal norms. </p> <p><a href="http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article26124.htm">http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article26124.htm</a><br> Khadr's torture confessions admissible, military judge rules:<br> Decision to admit statements despite threats of torture dramatically strengthens prosecution's case against Canadian held at Guantanamo Bay</p> <p><a href="http://bit.ly/aohmJq">http://bit.ly/aohmJq</a><br> Video: 'Child soldier' Gitmo trial draws criticismhttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38634007/ns/us_news-security/#slice-2 </p> <p> <small> <a href="http://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/13/10-08-10-torture-confessions-by-guantanamo-child-detainee-allowed-as-evidence-9176784/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p> http://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/13/10-08-10-torture-confessions-by-guantanamo-child-detainee-allowed-as-evidence-9176784/#commentshttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/13/10-08-10-aclu-scorecard-obama-is-embracing-abusive-bush-policies-9175104/tag:josephzernik.blog.co.uk,2010-08-13:/2010/08/13/10-08-10-aclu-scorecard-obama-is-embracing-abusive-bush-policies-9175104/Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:24:33 +0200 <p><img src="http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRNANFGxcZ0st4RC8ci5ICvdV-NVV-CIKFBKCQWjl0lgwXRd-0&t=1&usg=__4bEJzanOU9HLE9VXFMOMGWGl-Q0=" alt="" title=""><br> <strong>ACLU Scorecard: Obama Is Embracing Abusive Bush Policies</strong></p> <p>Tuesday 10 August 2010<br> by: Deb Weinstein, t r u t h o u t | Report<br> <a href="http://www.truth-out.org/aclu-scorecard-obama-is-embracing-abusive-bush-policies62153">http://www.truth-out.org/aclu-scorecard-obama-is-embracing-abusive-bush-policies62153</a></p> <p>For disillusioned Obama supporters, the ACLU's July report<br> "Establishing the New Normal" is not a heartening read.</p> <p>After being voted into office on promises that included undoing abuses<br> carried out under the Bush administration - promises to protect<br> privacy, to end government-sanctioned torture and rendition programs<br> and to end the use of military commissions for non-enemy combatants -<br> President Obama's administration is proving it is far easier to tow<br> the line than buck a trend.</p> <p>According to a report by the ACLU, the current White House has not<br> just failed to meaningfully follow through on its promises, but has<br> also taken abusive policies, and, as shown in the case of targeted and<br> interminable detentions, eroded civil rights to unprecedented levels.</p> <p>Although the ACLU applauds the administration's condemnation of the<br> torture and rendition programs instituted under Bush, it says these<br> positive steps are overwhelmed by what remains uncorrected and<br> unaddressed. Using the CIA's destruction of 92 interrogation tapes as<br> an example, the ACLU says that an investigation into the incident -<br> which was approved by a CIA official and is purported to have erased<br> torturous interrogations carried about by Americans - has dragged on<br> for three years with no resolution in sight The length of time is a<br> minor issue compared with what the ACLU says such foot dragging<br> signifies: "Sanctioning impunity for government officials who<br> authorized torture."</p> <p>Fear of an unchecked, unaccountable government permeates the ACLU's<br> report, particularly in the section about targeted killings. In this<br> instance, it is not just that the Obama administration has continued a<br> policy of targeting alleged terrorists, but that it has a new wrinkle:<br> American citizens, such as Anwar al-Awlaki, are also being rounded up<br> in the "O.K.-to-kill" list. The shortfalls of this approach are many,<br> and the ACLU says that the inaccuracy of less life-and-death<br> approaches should make such an approach intolerable. "Over the last<br> eight years, we have seen the government over and over again detain<br> men as 'terrorists,' only to discover later that the evidence was<br> weak, wrong, or non-existent," the report says.</p> <p>When the accused do have legal recourse, the ACLU says the<br> administration is also failing, and the two-tier court system<br> available to detainees - federal courts and military commissions -<br> does little to showcase the United States' legal system as fair and<br> just. Instead, the ACLU says the biased military commission system,<br> which has a lower evidence standard and allows anonymous, third-party<br> testimony, is also inhumane because abuse during detention or abuse<br> during interrogations do not disqualify testimony. The ACLU says even<br> the federal court system is tainted because it is used at the<br> government's discretion, and even then, only when the defense thinks<br> losing its case is impossible.</p> <p>The report also takes aim at detention itself. According to both the<br> ACLU and the Department of Justice's January 2010 Guantanamo Review<br> Task Force report, there are Yemenis, who in the parlance of the<br> Department of Justice, are eligible for "conditional detainment," and<br> in the language of the ACLU, "have been cleared for release after<br> years of harsh detention." These Yemenis can only be released under<br> the following conditions: if there is an appropriate rehabilitation<br> program for the detainees when and if they return home; if they cannot<br> be repatriated to Yemen, that the third-party country has sufficient<br> security. But first, the US has to revoke the moratorium on their<br> release. The ACLU says, however, that this problem is not confined to<br> Yemenis at Guantanamo, nor does blame rest solely with the president.<br> The ACLU says Congress has also helped keep individuals, specifically<br> Chinese Uighers, from being released.</p> <p>The ACLU also asserts that the current administration has allowed the<br> rules of detention to morph beyond reasonable limits such as geography<br> to the point that individuals can be picked up in areas that are not<br> war zones, transported to detention centers that are in war zones, and<br> then, based on the location of their detention, treated as though they<br> were captured in battle areas. Such power, the ACLU says, makes<br> everyone a combatant. The ACLU indicates the domestic impact of this<br> logic could erase civil rights, particularly if a Thompson, Illinois,<br> prison becomes a holding place for Guantanamo detainees. "We fear that<br> if precedent is established that terrorism suspects can be held<br> without trial in the United States, this administration and future<br> administrations will be tempted to bypass routinely the constitutional<br> restraints of the criminal justice system," the report says. </p> <p> <small> <a href="http://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/13/10-08-10-aclu-scorecard-obama-is-embracing-abusive-bush-policies-9175104/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p> http://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/13/10-08-10-aclu-scorecard-obama-is-embracing-abusive-bush-policies-9175104/#commentshttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/13/10-08-13-re-bd-518-503-complaint-against-attorney-david-pasternak-and-the-superior-court-of-california-county-of-los-angeles-for-public-corruptio-9173980/tag:josephzernik.blog.co.uk,2010-08-13:/2010/08/13/10-08-13-re-bd-518-503-complaint-against-attorney-david-pasternak-and-the-superior-court-of-california-county-of-los-angeles-for-public-corruptio-9173980/Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:43:52 +0200 <p><img src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_4QooSf0l1yE/TGUCPH4KWgI/AAAAAAAABoA/BEEWOrUTtbQ/s320/Pasternak+new+clean.jpg" alt="" title=""></p> <p><em>Attorney David Pasternak<br> Alleged Key Figure in Racketeering at the Los Angeles Superior Court</em></p> <p>Los Angles, August 13 – complaint was filed with US Attorney Office, Central District of California, by Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, against Attorney David Pasternak, the Superior Court of California, and others for public corruption and deprivation of rights and racketeering in receiverships operations at the Court in general, and in re case BD 518 503 in particular. The complaint alleged that Attorney David Pasternak appeared in the case as receiver with no authority at all, as part of a pattern of operating receiverships at the court with no legal foundation, and thereby looting persons coming to the Court, where they expect honest court services.<br> The complaint provided evidence of void, false on their faces, and deliberately misleading court orders appointing Mr Pasternak “Receiver” in the case:<br> a) An order appointing Attorney Pasternak was produced from the case, which failed to cite any section of the California code as the legal foundation for his authority;<br> b) The order came with a false and deliberately misleading authentication record, and<br> c) There was no evidence that the order was entered in the manner in which such orders are required to be entered pursuant to the California code to make them valid and “effectual for any purpose”.<br> Others named in the complaint were Commissioner James D Endman, Presiding Judge Charles McCoy, Clerk of the Court John A Clarke, Court Counsel Frederick Bennett, Attorney Elyse P Margolin (Levin & Margolin), Attorney Burton M Senkfor (Law Office of Burton Mark Senkfor), Attorney John A Ellis (Trope & Trope), and Attorney Edward Friedman (Turner Aubert & Friedman, LLP).<br> The complaint further claimed that conduct of receiverships of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, were a well-established racket. Previous complaints against Mr Pasternak and others noted similar conduct by Attorney David Pasternak in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) and Samaan v Zernik (SC087400), both alleged as real estate fraud by the Court through conduct of Attorney David Pasternak. In the latter case, James Wedick, a highly decorated FBI veteran, and a renowned fraud expert, also issued an opinion stating conduct of David Pasternak “fraud being committed”.<br> Fraud in operations of receiverships at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles was claimed as part of a larger fraud scheme, where the Court published for several decades false and deliberately misleading Local Rules claiming that Judgment Books of the Court were maintained by the Clerk at the various Districts of the Court, while in fact no such Books were maintained by the Court for several decades. Presiding Judge Charles McCoy and Clerk of the Court John A Clarke also refused to correct such false Local Rules, or disclose to true Local Rules of the Court regarding Judgment Books. Court Counsel Frederick Bennett, alleged as a central figure in the racket, claimed with no authority at all that the Judgment Book of the Court today was the Microfilm Judgment Archive of the Court. Review of a large volume of records in the Microfilm Archive indeed revealed routine entry of divorce decrees. However, hardly any judgments of the civil courts were found entered in the Archive, and not a single order appointing receiver was ever found in the Archive.<br> David Pasternak is former President of the Los Angeles County Bar Association, former Member of the California Judicial Council, and former President of Bet Tzedek (“The House of Justice”) – a prominent Los Angeles Jewish charity. Therefore, the complaint alleged that his conduct reflected widespread corruption of the California courts and the legal profession.<br> Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States.</p> <p><strong>LINKS<br> [1]</strong> 10-08-13-RE-RE-BD-518-503-Complaint-against-Attorney-David-Pasternak-and-the-Superior-Court-of-California-County-of-Los-Angeles-for-public-corruption and racketeering in re: Pretense receiverships at the Court.<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/35828312/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/35828312/</a> </p> <p> <small> <a href="http://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/13/10-08-13-re-bd-518-503-complaint-against-attorney-david-pasternak-and-the-superior-court-of-california-county-of-los-angeles-for-public-corruptio-9173980/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p> judicial-corruptionlos-angelesdavid-pasternakcaliforniahttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/13/10-08-13-re-bd-518-503-complaint-against-attorney-david-pasternak-and-the-superior-court-of-california-county-of-los-angeles-for-public-corruptio-9173980/#commentshttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/09/10-08-08-10-08-08-complaint-for-public-corruption-and-racketeering-against-jacqueline-connor-judge-of-the-los-angeles-superior-court-9152737/tag:josephzernik.blog.co.uk,2010-08-09:/2010/08/09/10-08-08-10-08-08-complaint-for-public-corruption-and-racketeering-against-jacqueline-connor-judge-of-the-los-angeles-superior-court-9152737/Mon, 09 Aug 2010 16:51:56 +0200 <p><img src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_4QooSf0l1yE/TGAUKEZP7OI/AAAAAAAABn4/K6eoqQWlzLc/s320/connor+portrait+good.jpg" alt="" title=""><br> <em>California Judge Jacqueline Connor<br> Central figure in alleged racketeering at the Los Angeles Courts</em></p> <p><strong>Complaint for Public Corruption and Racketeering against Jacqueline Connor - Judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court </strong><br> <strong>Executive Summary [1]</strong><br> Los Angles, August 9 - complaint was filed with US Attorney Office, Central District of California, by Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, against Judge Jacqueline Connor of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, for Public Corruption and Deprivation of Rights at both the Civil and Criminal Divisions of the Court. The complaint alleged that Judge Jacqueline Connor was a leader of racketeering at the Court. Moreover, the complaint claimed unique public policy significance, since Judge Connor was a key figure in the Rampart scandal (1998-2000) - the largest corruption scandal of the justice system in the history of the United States and a key event in history of the Los Angeles justice system. Furthermore, such judge, alleged as key figure in racketeering, imposed, according to media reports, capital punishments on criminal Defendants at the Court.</p> <p>At the Civil Division - the complaint detailed the leading role of Judge Jacqueline Connor in conduct of pretense litigation in Samaan v Zernik (SC087400), opined as real estate fraud by the Court, and alleged as perversion of justice and racketeering from the bench.</p> <p>Others named as perpetrators in the case included, but were not limited to:<br> Judge Allan Goodman, Judge John Segal, Judge Linda Hart-Cole, Judge Terry Friedman, Supervising Judge Gerald Rosenberg, and Presiding Charles McCoy, Judge (ret) Gregory O'Brien Judge (ret) Patricia Collins, and Clerk John Clarke - all of the Los Angeles Superior Court, and Attorney David Pasternak � former President of the Los Angeles County Bar Association and also former President of Bet Tzedek ("The House of Justice") - a prominent Los Angeles Jewish charity.</p> <p>Multiple judges of the Court colluded in the presiding in the case with no Assignment Orders, and the Clerk of the Court, John A Clarke, refused to certify the case as litigation of the Superior Court of California. </p> <p>Plaintiff never paid her filing fee in the case, but the Clerk refused to dismiss the complaint. All consequent fees collected by the Clerk were designated in the Register of Actions (California civil docket) as "Journal Entry", whereas in other cases of the Court such fees were designated as "Filing Fees", "Motion Fees", "Stipulation Fees", etc. Presiding Judge Charles McCoy and Clerk of the Court John A Clarke refused to disclose the ultimate designation of the funds. Accountancy texts consider misuse of "Journal Entry" as a cardinal sign of high-level financial management fraud. </p> <p>No minutes, orders, or judgment were ever authenticated in the case. No judgment was ever entered in the case and no writ of execution was ever issued. Regardless, Attorney David Pasternak forcibly took possession of real property on behalf of the Superior Court. He then proceeded to issue on behalf of the Court Grant deeds, which were opined by Fraud Expert as "fraud being committed".</p> <p>The complaint provided evidence of void, false on their faces, and deliberately misleading court minutes, orders, and judgment, which were routinely issued by Judge Jacqueline Connor in the case, but which were nevertheless inserted in the court file and acted upon by Judge Connor, as if they were valid court records. </p> <p>Two events were listed as notable evidence of the alleged fraud and perversion of justice by Judge Jacqueline Connor in the case:</p> <p>a) On June 6, 2007, Judge Connor conducted an ex parte proceeding in a dark courtroom, where Countrywide Financial Corporation was permitted to appear under false party designation of "Non Party" with a fraudulent request for a gag/protective order. In such off the record, off the calendar proceeding Judge Jacqueline Connor issued a ruling, which was represented in court as a valid court ruling, and was later acted upon by Judge Connor as such. However, in the Register of Actions (California civil docket) Judge Connor recorded the proceeding as "Proceeding not recorded", Countrywide's paper, which was filed on that date was eliminated from the paper court file, and no minutes were ever entered in the paper court file either. </p> <p>b) On September 10, 2007, Judge Connor recorded in the Register of Actions a hearing that was never heard, and a ruling that was never ruled - after she consented to be removed from the case following Disqualification for a Cause. In such alleged fraud, Judge Connor recorded a fictitious hearing and fictitious ruling pertaining to fraud in Countrywide's banking records, which she had previously falsely admitted as evidence in the case. </p> <p>The complaint alleged that Judge Jacqueline Connor's routine fraud technique in Samaan v Zernik involved issuing void, not voidable records, which could appear to a naive reviewer as merely inadvertent errors. Judge Connor, nevertheless, treated such void, false on their faces records, as honest, valid, and effectual court records. </p> <p>At the Criminal Division - the complaint alleged that Judge Jacqueline Connor engaged in fraud and perversion of justice, while presiding with no authority at all in the First Rampart Trial (2000) - the People v People v Edward Ortiz, Brian Liddy, Michael Buchanan, et al. The litigation originated from Rampart scandal investigation (1998-2000) - the largest corruption scandal of the justice system in the history of United States. Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, founding Dean of the University of California, Irvine Law School, opined in 2001: "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."</p> <p>As noted by media already in 2000, Judge Connor had been directly involved in conduct of LAPD officers and district prosecutors - the subject matter, which was purportedly reviewed in the prosecution. She was also reported to have been unusually close to the Defendants and a key witness - Rafael Perez, prior to eruption of the scandal. Furthermore, she had also made discriminatory public comments pertaining to the subject matter prior to the onset of the prosecution. Nevertheless, Judge Jacqueline Connor failed to recuse from the case. </p> <p>Judge Connor consequently ruled to exclude much of the prosecution's evidence in the case. After jury nevertheless convicted three of the Defendants, she issued from home a ruling, claiming that her inadvertent errors in the case "fatally biased" the jury. Therefore, she reversed jury convictions. Her conduct in the case was described by media as "unprecedented".</p> <p>Through such conduct in the First Rampart Trial it was alleged that Judge Jacqueline Connor undermined judicial review of criminalities that were part of the Rampart corruption scandal, and that she was central to the ongoing false imprisonment of thousands of Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) - victims of the Rampart scandal, who have never been released to this date. The official Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) documented judges of the Court as central to the continued false imprisonment of the Rampart-FIPs, and called for "external investigation" of the Court, which has never been instituted to this date. </p> <p>The complaint also alleged, based on anonymous accounts by criminal defense attorneys, pertaining to other criminal prosecutions, that competent investigation would discover plenty of additional evidence of Judge Jacqueline Connor's alleged corruption in other prosecutions at the Criminal Division of the Court.</p> <p>Overall, the complaint alleged that only through combined review of Judge Connor's conduct at both the Civil and the Criminal Divisions, the full scope of her alleged corruption and her leading role in racketeering at the Court would be discovered. </p> <p>Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States.</p> <p><strong>LINKS:</strong><br> [1] For ease of access to the hyperlinks provided in instant complaint, an online copy was also posted online at:<br> 10-08-09-Complaint-Filed-with-US-Attorney-Office-against-California-Judge-Jacqueline-Connor-for-Public-Corruption-and-Racketeering-s<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/35592511/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/35592511/</a></p> <p><strong>CC:</strong><br> 1) Prof David Burcham - former Dean, Loyola Law School<br> 2) Prof Erwin Chemerinsky - Dean, Irvine Law School<br> 3) Attorney Connie Rice - Los Angeles Advancement Project<br> 4) UPR Office of the United Nations<br> 5) UPR Office of the US State Department:<br> 6) The Honorable Dianne Feinstein - Senator from California<br> 7) US Senate and House of Representatives - Judiciary Committees </p> <p> <small> <a href="http://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/09/10-08-08-10-08-08-complaint-for-public-corruption-and-racketeering-against-jacqueline-connor-judge-of-the-los-angeles-superior-court-9152737/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p> rampart-scandaljudge-jacqueline-connorfalse-imprisonmentsjudicial-corruptionhttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/09/10-08-08-10-08-08-complaint-for-public-corruption-and-racketeering-against-jacqueline-connor-judge-of-the-los-angeles-superior-court-9152737/#commentshttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/03/10-08-03-us-officer-mary-schapiro-sec-chair-requested-to-perform-her-duties-in-re-complaints-against-bank-of-america-corporation-nyse-bac-and-cou-9098471/tag:josephzernik.blog.co.uk,2010-08-03:/2010/08/03/10-08-03-us-officer-mary-schapiro-sec-chair-requested-to-perform-her-duties-in-re-complaints-against-bank-of-america-corporation-nyse-bac-and-cou-9098471/Tue, 03 Aug 2010 13:06:07 +0200 <p><img src="http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:UxpMOYgi8vRk5M:b" alt="" title=""><br> Los Angeles, August 3 - Joseph Zernik, PhD, Shareholder of Bank of America Corporation, and victim of fraud by the Corporation, as opined by fraud experts, filed request with Mary Schapiro, Stock and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair, to perform her duties as a US officer, by acknowledging receipt of Complaints, by issuing reference numbers on Complaints, as such, by ensuring the timely investigation and response on Complaints, and by according equal protection to the Complainant and shareholders of the Corporation. [1]</p> <p>The request followed a July 27, 2010 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) response by SEC, [2] which failed to include complaints filed starting 2007 against Countrywide Financial Corporation, Bank of America Corporation, Angelo Mozilo, Sandor Samuels, and Brian Moynihan. The FOIA response however, did provide documentation of refusal of SEC to provide acknowledgement on the Complaints, as such, with complaint reference numbers, regardless of repeated requests. Also missing from the FOIA response was any response on the Complaints. Dr Zernik never received any response on the Complaints, either.</p> <p>In his request, Dr Zernik pointed out the high public policy significance of the Complaints, [3] [4] which included detailed evidence of:<br> 1) Large-scale fraud against the US Government - through the funding of sub-prime loans with no underwriting at all, as far back as 2004;<br> 2) Large-scale fraud against Shareholders - through the undermining of any internal or external audit at Countrywide Financial Corporation as early as 2004;<br> 3) Failure of Bank of America Corporation to perform in compliance with the Securities and Exchange Acts and Sarbanes-Oxley Act (2002), including, but not limited to refusal to permit the Audit Committee to review Complaints filed pursuant to the law, and false certifications by CEO Brian Moynihan in reports filed with SEC in 2010;<br> 4) False disclosures pursuant to the Basel Accords on international banking;<br> 5) Ongoing refusal of the United States Government to establish honest and effectual banking regulation, and<br> 6) The tight linkage between integrity, or lack thereof, of the courts and the legal profession in the United States, and the current financial crisis, and ongoing refusal of the United States Government to protect the Human Rights of individuals against alleged criminality by large financial institutions.</p> <p>The request also noted that the Complaints [3] [4] provided detailed evidence regarding circumstances surrounding the ouster of Mr Timothy Mayopoulos as General Counsel of Bank of America Corporation on December 10, 2008, a question that had been unsuccessfully investigated by US Congress, by New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, and others. The evidence provided in the Complaints showed that following the July 1, 2008 takeover of Countrywide Financial Corporation by Bank of America Corporation, Mr Mayopoulos brought to a halt conduct at the Legal Department of Countrywide Financial Corporation, which was alleged as racketeering. Within 24 hours after his ouster and the appointment of Brian Moynihan as General Counsel, such conduct was resumed.</p> <p>Brian Moynihan was today Bank of America Corporation's President, and the Corporation was the recipient of some $200 billions in bailout funds under the current crisis. Failure of SEC to address the Complaints was claimed as reflection of failure of the United States to act as a good-faith party to the Basel Accords on international banking, as undermining any valid risk assessment and risk reduction at the largest consumer bank in the United States, whose stability and liquidity were repeatedly questioned in recent years by analysts, and as reflection of failure to abide by duties and responsibilities of the United States pursuant to ratified international law - the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.</p> <p>The request was copied to the Ambassador of the People's Republic of China - holder of over $2 trillion reserves denominated in US Dollars, to the United Nations High Commissioner of Human Rights - as part of the 2010 Universal Periodic Review of Human Rights in the United States, to the Basel Accords Committee on international banking, and to the US Congress Judiciary and Banking Committees.</p> <p><strong>LINKS/ATTACHED:</strong><br> [1] August 3, 2010 Request for US Officer - Mary Schapiro, SEC Chair to Perform her Duties.<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/35281682/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/35281682/</a><br> [2] July 27, 2010 SEC FOIA response #10-03965, re: Complaints against Bank of America Corporation (NYSE:BAC) and Countrywide Financial Corporation:<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/35271682/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/35271682/</a><br> [3] March 6, 2010 Complaint filed with SEC Chair Mary Schapiro against Bank of America Corporation (NYSE:BAC) and its President/CEO and former General Counsel � Brian Moynihan.<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/29653973/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/29653973/</a><br> [4]June 11, 2010 Complaints filed with Office of Comptroller of the Currency and SEC Chair Mary Schapiro against Countrywide Financial Corporation, Bank of America Corporation, and its CEO/President Brian Moynihan alleging fraud and extortion on Dr Zernik fraud on shareholders, banking regulators, and the US taxpayer.<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/32907453/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/32907453/</a><br> Human Rights Alert (HRA), NGO</p> <p>Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States.</p> <p><a href="http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert">http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert</a><br> <a href="http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/">http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/</a><br> <a href="http://josephzernik.blog.co.uk/">http://josephzernik.blog.co.uk/</a><br> <a href="http://menchenrechte-los-angeles.blogspot.com/">http://menchenrechte-los-angeles.blogspot.com/</a><br> <a href="http://droitsdelhommealertelosangele.blogspot.com/">http://droitsdelhommealertelosangele.blogspot.com/</a><br> <a href="http://inproperinla.com/">http://inproperinla.com/</a><br> <a href="http://pressroom.prlog.org/Human_Rights_Alert/">http://pressroom.prlog.org/Human_Rights_Alert/</a><br> <a href="http://ireport.cnn.com/people/HumanRightsA?numResults=10&view=documents">http://ireport.cnn.com/people/HumanRightsA?numResults=10&view=documents</a><br> <a href="http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine">http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine</a> </p> <p> <small> <a href="http://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/03/10-08-03-us-officer-mary-schapiro-sec-chair-requested-to-perform-her-duties-in-re-complaints-against-bank-of-america-corporation-nyse-bac-and-cou-9098471/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p> mary-schapirobank-of-america-corporation-nysebacangelo-mozilosecsandor-samuelsstock-and-exchange-commissionbanking-regulationbrian-moynihanhttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/03/10-08-03-us-officer-mary-schapiro-sec-chair-requested-to-perform-her-duties-in-re-complaints-against-bank-of-america-corporation-nyse-bac-and-cou-9098471/#commentshttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/02/10-08-02-end-to-advertising-for-church-of-scientology-on-los-angeles-business-examiner-site-requested-9093252/tag:josephzernik.blog.co.uk,2010-08-02:/2010/08/02/10-08-02-end-to-advertising-for-church-of-scientology-on-los-angeles-business-examiner-site-requested-9093252/Mon, 02 Aug 2010 22:41:14 +0200 <p><img src="http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ0hAbSB5vnU5svE3CUSQI0MBm_TOBzHORMJSuU6a9YW0AAkjM&t=1&usg=__zljR0Ai9zTghjT1Fw91zWLHfjbc=" alt="" title=""> <img src="http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSwKYG1r8cgmzT3rFrPjYMxak9Hsmxue2dCiVPPtrdm5Y1l90s&t=1&usg=__Gl4bnfyGowJfbK0dvIw2Wx59Gi8=" alt="" title=""><br> <em>Leroy Baca, Sheriff of Los Angeles County<br> Closely identified with 'Church of Scientology"</em><br> Los Angeles, August 2 - Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD - Los Angeles Business Examiner, requested that Examiner.com cease advertising for the "Church of Scientology" on the Los Angeles Business Examiner site.<br> One of the main topics covered at the site was the alleged false imprisonment of the 70 year old former US Prosecutor Richard Fine, who blew the whistle on “not permitted” payments (“bribes”) secretly taken by judges of Los Angeles County, California.</p> <p>The individual who was falsely holding Richard Fine under solitary confinement for the past 18 months was Leroy Baca, Sheriff of Los Angeles County, who was closely identified with the "Church of Scientology".</p> <p>Other topics, which were covered at the site related to the ongoing large scale false imprisonments in Los Angeles County, as reported in official, unofficial, and media report for over a decade. In that case too, Mr Baca was a central figure among the perpetrators.</p> <p>Therefore, advertising for the "Church of Scientology" at the site was considered by Human Rights Alert (NGO) at least in bad taste, if not inappropriate.<br> Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of online public access and case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States. </p> <p> <small> <a href="http://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/02/10-08-02-end-to-advertising-for-church-of-scientology-on-los-angeles-business-examiner-site-requested-9093252/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p> sheriff-of-los-angeles-countyfalse-imprisonmentsleroy-bacahttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/02/10-08-02-end-to-advertising-for-church-of-scientology-on-los-angeles-business-examiner-site-requested-9093252/#commentshttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/02/10-08-01-prison-discipline-hearing-in-california-are-fixed-9087708/tag:josephzernik.blog.co.uk,2010-08-02:/2010/08/02/10-08-01-prison-discipline-hearing-in-california-are-fixed-9087708/Mon, 02 Aug 2010 09:41:12 +0200 <p><img src="http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcR7nUCwQ-ETcCSIgrb-mlU75Rm120hP0YcIcgTxcthhTvZrvCE&t=1&usg=__bXaNw5JEKMNR32_9-fJJbr6hOmM=" alt="" title=""><br> Eastern California Blog<br> <strong>Smoking Gun Email Shows Kern Prison Discipline Hearings Are Fixed</strong><br> Posted: 01 Aug 2010 08:35 AM PDT<br> The prison official assured his warden in an e-mail that everything was set: A group of 77 inmates accused of interfering with officers would be found guilty, no matter what.<br> Disciplinary hearings – required proceedings where inmates can defend themselves with witnesses and evidence – had not yet taken place at North Kern State Prison.<br> Yet, in the April e-mail obtained by The Bee, acting Associate Warden Steven Ojeda promised to provide the hearing officers – lieutenants he supervised – "with direction prior to the hearings and ensure they understand to hold all of these inmates accountable."<br> Leaving nothing to chance, Ojeda prescribed punishments, too: loss of good-behavior credit and visiting privileges, threat of a term in one of the prison system's security housing units – called "the hole" by prisoners – and other serious penalties.<br> By acting as judge and jury, Ojeda fit a pattern, a Bee investigation has found, that suggests widespread suppression of inmates' rights to contest allegations by guards or pursue claims of mistreatment.<br> Current and retired officers, prisoners and parolees allege that correctional officers and their superiors routinely file bogus or misleading reports, destroy or falsify documentation of abuses, and intimidate colleagues or inmates who push back.<br> Sacramento Bee, 8/1/10 </p> <p> <small> <a href="http://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/02/10-08-01-prison-discipline-hearing-in-california-are-fixed-9087708/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p> abuse-in-the-prisonshttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/02/10-08-01-prison-discipline-hearing-in-california-are-fixed-9087708/#commentshttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/01/10-08-01-fine-v-baca-09-a827-further-evidence-for-fraud-misprision-of-felonies-at-the-us-supreme-court-9084586/tag:josephzernik.blog.co.uk,2010-08-01:/2010/08/01/10-08-01-fine-v-baca-09-a827-further-evidence-for-fraud-misprision-of-felonies-at-the-us-supreme-court-9084586/Sun, 01 Aug 2010 21:55:31 +0200 <p><img src="http://inproperinla.com/pic-suterclearkscotus.jpg" alt="" title="null"><br> <em>William Suter<br> Clerk of the US Supreme Court </em><br> <strong>Fine v Baca (09-A827) - Further Evidence for Fraud, Misprision of Felonies at the US Supreme Court</strong><br> Los Angeles, August 1 - Human Rights Alert (NGO) released additional evidence of fraud and misprision of felonies at the US Supreme Court in re: Richard Fine v Leroy Baca, Sheriff of Los Angeles County (09-A827) - application for stay of execution of ongoing solitary confinement of the 70 year old former US Prosecutor Richard Fine, who blew the whistle on "not permitted" payments ("bribes") secretly taken by judges of Los Angeles County, California. [1]<br> Records recently received by Joseph Zernik, PhD, from the Court included an April 29, 2010 letter, signed by Court Counsel Danny Bickell on behalf of Clerk of the Court William Suter, noting: "Your motion to intervene, received April 21, 2010, is herewith returned."<br> The records also included the Motion to Intervene and related papers, [1] with stamp of US Marshals at the Court, indicating receipt of the records on March 20, 2010, and "RECEIVED" stamp of the Office of the Clerk, Supreme Court of the US, dated April 21, 2010.<br> The April 29, 2010 letter by Mr Bickell documented that Mr Bickell held the records, filed in a timely manner, past the April 23, 2010 conference of the Court, where the case was purportedly reviewed. Furthermore, the letter documented that Mr Bickell denied review of the records by authorized Clerks and/or Justices of the court, and issued instead a letter, stating that the Motion and related papers were "returned", with no authority and with no legal foundation at all.<br> Human Rights Alert alleged that upon investigation and competent review, such conduct would be found as deprivation of rights by Mr Bickell, including, but not limited to the right to file petitions, access to the courts, equal protection, and due process of law.<br> Conduct of Mr Bickell must be deemed particularly alarming, since papers, which were filed with the Motion to Intervene [2], [3] also documented the prior alleged fraud by Mr Bickell, related to an unsigned, unauthorized notice he had sent to former US Prosecutor Richard Fine, falsely stating the March 12, 2010 denial of the Application by Justice Kennedy, with no legal foundation in the Court records in the case.<br> The papers filed on April 20, 2010 with the Motion to Intervene requested that the Court initiated corrective actions relative to conduct of Mr Bickell in the matter.<br> Human Rights Alert further alleged that upon investigation and competent review it would be found that conduct in the matter involved collusion and/or misprision of felonies by Mr William Suter - Clerk of the Supreme Court of the US.<br> Combined, conduct of Counsel Bickell and Clerk Suter was alleged as intended to cover up misconduct by other justice system agencies relative to former US Prosecutor Richard Fine, which was also detailed in the papers filed with the Motion to Intervene. Such conduct facilitated the continued alleged false imprisonment of Richard Fine.<br> On April 21, 2010, Deputy Clerk of the Court acknowledged by phone receipt of the Motion to Intervene and related papers, but explained that the records failed to appear in the online docket of the Court, since they were held by Court Counsel Danny Bickell.<br> On April 21, 2010, Mr Bickell by phone first attempted to deny that the Motion and related papers were received at all. Later he acknowledged that he was holding the records, and further explained that he would determine their disposition, although he consented that he was authorized neither as Clerk nor as a Deputy Clerk of the Court.<br> Following the April 23, 2010, conference, disposition of the Application remained unknown.<br> On April 26, 2010 a note appeared in the US Supreme Court online docket, [4] indicating denial of the Application.<br> However, records, which were obtained from the Court file on July 26, 2010, showed no legal foundation at all for the April 26, 2010 denial noted in the online Court docket. [4]<br> Therefore, it was alleged that the case documented the repeated fraud in publication of false notes in the online US Supreme Court docket, fraud in the issuing of false, unauthorized notices by US Supreme Court Counsel Danny Bickell, all committed with collusion and/or misprision by US Supreme Court Clerk William Suter.<br> Former US prosecutor Richard Fine exposed, publicized, and rebuked the taking by judges in Los Angeles County of "not permitted" payments ("bribes"), which necessitated the signing on February 20, 2009 of "retroactive immunities" ("pardons") for all such judges. Since March 4, 2009, he has been imprisoned in solitary confinement in Los Angeles, California. Albeit, no warrant was ever issued, and no judgment/ conviction/ sentencing was ever entered in his case.<br> The case of Richard Fine documented a pattern of publication of false records in online public access systems, and denial of access to true judicial records:<br> 1) The Los Angeles Superior Court - published a false online "Case Summary", but denied access to the Register of Actions (California civil docket) in the case management system of the court in the case.<br> 2) The Sheriff of Los Angeles County - published false online arrest and booking records in its "Inmate Information Center", but denied access to the true Los Angeles County Booking Record of Inmate Richard Fine.<br> 3) The US District Court, Los Angeles - published a false online "PACER docket", but denied access to the NEFs (Notices of Electronic Filing - the authentication records) in the case, and to the paper record, which was Richard Fine's commencing record - the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, which was allegedly adulterated at the US District Court.<br> 4) The US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit - published false online "PACER dockets", but denied access to the NDAs (Notices of Docket Activity - the authentication records), and also to critical records filed by respondents in the appeal.<br> 5) The US Supreme Court - published a false online "docket" noting denials on both March 12, 2010 and April 23/26, 2010, which were not supported by the Court records in the case. The US Supreme Court online "docket" further failed to list the Motion to Intervene and related papers in the case. Access to true dockets in the case management system of the Supreme Court was yet to be permitted.<br> Therefore, Human Rights Alert submitted a request to the US Congress Judiciary Committees to establish by law the operation of the online public access systems and case management systems of the US Courts. [5]<br> Notice of the newly discovered records of the US Supreme Court was also submitted to the US State Department and the United Nations.<br> Review of such conduct by the courts was sought by Human Rights Alert as part of the pending review of Human Rights in the United States in the first ever UPR (universal periodic review) of Human Rights in the United States by the United Nations scheduled for November 2010. The April 2010 UPR report by Human Rights Alert, alleged large-scale fraud in online public access and case management systems of the courts in the United States. The report called for publicly and legally accountable validation of such systems.<br> Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of online public access and case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States.<br> LINKS<br> [1] 10-08-01-Fine-v-Baca-09-A827-at-the-US-Supreme-Court-Further-Evidence-of-Fraud-Misprision-of-Felonies-April-29-2010-Letter-by-Court-Counsel-Bickell noting Motion to Intervene and related papers were "returned".<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/35193676/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/35193676/</a><br> [2] 10-04-20 Motion to Intervene and related papers<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/30304657/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/30304657/</a><br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161573/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161573/</a><br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161636/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161636/</a><br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/30162109/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/30162109/</a><br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/30162144/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/30162144/</a><br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161692/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161692/</a><br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/30185575/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/30185575/</a><br> [3] Complaint against US Supreme Court Counsel Danny Bickell Alleged Public Corruption and Deprivation of Rights<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/33772313/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/33772313/</a><br> [4] 10-07-26 Human Rights Alert's Request for Representation by Dean Minow at US Supreme Court Relative to Alleged Fraud in US Supreme Court Records<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/34940014/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/34940014/</a><br> 10-07-25 Fine v Baca (09 A827) Alleged fraud in US Supreme Court records in Fine v Baca (09-A827)<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/34834530/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/34834530/</a><br> 10-07-28 Fine v Baca (09-A827) Additional Evidence for Fraud at the US Supreme Court pertaining to purported denial of the Application in Conference<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/35014599/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/35014599/</a><br> [5] 01-07-31 Human Rights Alert s Request for the Judiciary Committees to Establish Case Management and Online Public Access System of the US Courts by Law<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/35149271/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/35149271/</a></p> <p>Joseph Zernik, PhD<br> Human Rights Alert (HRA), NGO<br> Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States.</p> <p><a href="http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert">http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert</a><br> <a href="http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/">http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/</a><br> <a href="http://josephzernik.blog.co.uk/">http://josephzernik.blog.co.uk/</a><br> <a href="http://menchenrechte-los-angeles.blogspot.com/">http://menchenrechte-los-angeles.blogspot.com/</a><br> <a href="http://droitsdelhommealertelosangele.blogspot.com/">http://droitsdelhommealertelosangele.blogspot.com/</a><br> <a href="http://inproperinla.com/">http://inproperinla.com/</a><br> <a href="http://pressroom.prlog.org/Human_Rights_Alert/">http://pressroom.prlog.org/Human_Rights_Alert/</a><br> <a href="http://ireport.cnn.com/people/HumanRightsA?numResults=10&view=documents">http://ireport.cnn.com/people/HumanRightsA?numResults=10&view=documents</a><br> <a href="http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine">http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine</a><br> _____________________________<br> WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?<br> * "Innocent people remain in prison"<br> * "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."<br> LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/</a><br> * "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."<br> Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2000)<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/</a><br> * "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."<br> Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2000)<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/274339">http://www.scribd.com/doc/274339</a><br> _____________________________<br> 2010 UPR (UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW) OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE UNITED STATES BY THE UNITED NATIONS<br> April 19, 2010 Human Rights Alert submission for the 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States by the United Nations:<br> a) Press Release:<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/30200004/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/30200004/</a><br> b) Submission:<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/30147583/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/30147583/</a><br> c) Appendix:<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/30163613/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/30163613/</a><br> d) UPR Tool Kit by the Urban Justice Center:<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/29867561/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/29867561/</a><br> _____________________________ </p> <p> <small> <a href="http://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/01/10-08-01-fine-v-baca-09-a827-further-evidence-for-fraud-misprision-of-felonies-at-the-us-supreme-court-9084586/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p> judicial-corruptionmisprision-of-clerkhttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/08/01/10-08-01-fine-v-baca-09-a827-further-evidence-for-fraud-misprision-of-felonies-at-the-us-supreme-court-9084586/#commentshttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/31/10-07-31-human-rights-alert-s-request-for-us-congress-judiciary-committees-to-establish-by-law-the-case-management-and-online-public-access-syste-9077820/tag:josephzernik.blog.co.uk,2010-07-31:/2010/07/31/10-07-31-human-rights-alert-s-request-for-us-congress-judiciary-committees-to-establish-by-law-the-case-management-and-online-public-access-syste-9077820/Sat, 31 Jul 2010 16:01:58 +0200 <p><img src="http://inproperinla.com/pic-hra-ogo.jpg" alt="" title=""><br> Los Angeles, July 31 - Human Rights Alert (NGO) forwarded a request to the US Congressional Committees on the Judiciary for urgent review and legislative initiative regarding case management and online public access systems of the US courts. Such systems were introduced over the past decade through a large-scale project by the Administrative Office of the US Courts, albeit with no public oversight. Moreover, the courts failed to publish Rules of Courts to govern their operation. Evidence was provided that such systems have caused precipitous deterioration in integrity of the courts, particularly in the areas of Banking Regulation and Human Rights. The evidence showed that litigations, which were widely reported by media as court actions, were only pretense, with no valid judicial review at all. </p> <p>The following key deficiencies were identified:<br> 1) All courts that were examined, from the District Courts, through the Courts of Appeals, to the US Supreme Court, have failed to publish Rules of Court to set the legal foundation for the operation of case management and online public access systems, in apparent violation of Due Process rights.<br> 2) The manner in which case management and online public access systems were operated today, the public at large, and even attorneys could not distinguish between valid and effectual court records and records that were deemed void, not voidable by the courts themselves. Both types of records were published in online public access systems in a manner that had to be deemed as serious violation of various fundamental Constitutional, Civil, and Human Rights.<br> 3) Public access was routinely denied to critical judicial records, in apparent violation of First Amendment rights, and the range of judicial records, which were publicly accessible varied among the courts with no foundation at the law at all.<br> 4) The key role of Clerks in authentication of court records, which was established over the centuries as a critical safeguard for integrity of the courts, was largely eliminated - a sea change in administration of the courts, which was never established by law. Dockets were now constructed by unauthorized persons, and the Clerk refused to certify them. Unauthenticated judgments were entered in the Index of Judgments with no authority at all.<br> 5) Discrimination against pro se litigants, and unprecedented authority for counsel to enter court records with no prior review by authority of the Clerk, which were established in the case management systems, undermined Due Process and Fair Hearing rights.<br> 6) Similar conditions were documented in the courts of the several states as well.</p> <p>Key features were outlined of the desired legislation:<br> 1) Any case management and online public access systems should be recognized as inherently affecting changes in court procedures. Therefore, their installation must be established by law. Validation of such systems must be undertaken prior to their installation, in a manner that is legally and publicly accountable - e.g. through agencies under control of the legislative branch.<br> 2) Data that must be entered only by authority of the Clerk of the Court should be defined, including, but not limited entries in the online dockets, where the name, authority, and digital signature of the person entering the data should be publicly accessible.<br> 3) All court records must be publicly accessible, pursuant to First Amendment, Due Process, and Public Trial rights, including, but not limited to all authentication records, unless access is denied by law or through documented sealing orders.<br> 4) Authentication records of the US District Courts (NEF - Notices of Electronic Filing) and the US Courts of Appeals (NDAs - Notices of Docket Activity) must be re-drafted, to form valid certification of authentication records, clear and unambiguous reference should be included in such records to the judicial records being authenticated, as well as visible names, authority, and digital signatures of those issuing the authentication records � as signs of intention to take responsibility. Dockets must be constructed only by authority of the Clerk. Judgments must be entered into the Judgment Index only by the authority of the Clerk.<br> 5) Counsel must not be permitted to enter court records in the dockets with no prior review by authority of the clerk; pro se litigants and counsel should be given equal standing in access to such systems.<br> 6) Key provisions of such legislation should apply to the courts of the several states as well.<br> Conditions now prevailing in the US justice system were deemed as undermining the framework of lawful and effective government. Such conditions incurred risks that cannot be easily assessed to stability of US financial infrastructure, Human Rights, and the Rule of Law.<br> The proposal was copied to the US State Department and the United Nations, as part of the pending, first ever UPR (universal periodic review) of Human Rights in the United States by the United Nations scheduled for November 2010. The April UPR report by Human Rights Alert, alleged large-scale fraud in online public access and case management systems of the courts in the United States. The report called for publicly and legally accountable validation of such systems by the legislative branch.<br> Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of online public access and case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States.<br> The proposal was also copied to the Basel Accord Committee, since in such Accords, the US government made commitments for honest and effective regulation of the US banking system, valid risk assessment, and effective risk reduction.</p> <p><strong>LINKS</strong><br> 01-07-31-Human-Rights-Alert-s-Request-for-the-Judiciary-Committees-to-Establish-Case-Management-and-Online-Publi<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/35149271/"><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/35149271/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/35149271/</a></a> </p> <p> <small> <a href="http://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/31/10-07-31-human-rights-alert-s-request-for-us-congress-judiciary-committees-to-establish-by-law-the-case-management-and-online-public-access-syste-9077820/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p> misprision-of-clerkjudicial-corruptionhttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/31/10-07-31-human-rights-alert-s-request-for-us-congress-judiciary-committees-to-establish-by-law-the-case-management-and-online-public-access-syste-9077820/#commentshttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/29/10-07-29-additional-evidence-for-fraud-at-the-us-supreme-court-in-re-richard-fine-9065710/tag:josephzernik.blog.co.uk,2010-07-29:/2010/07/29/10-07-29-additional-evidence-for-fraud-at-the-us-supreme-court-in-re-richard-fine-9065710/Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:43:32 +0200 <p><img src="http://inproperinla.com/pic-suterclearkscotus.jpg" alt="" title=""><br> <em>William Suter<br> Clerk of the US Supreme Court</em><br> <strong>Additional Evidence for Fraud at the US Supreme Court, in re: Richard Fine </strong><br> Los Angeles, July 29 - Human Rights Alert (BGO) released additional evidence of fraud at the US Supreme Court in re: Richard Fine v Lerory Baca, Sheriff of Los Angeles County (09-A827) - application for stay of execution of ongoing solitary confinement. Records recently retrieved from the US Supreme Court file in the case failed to discover any valid court records supporting the purported denial of the Application in the Supreme Court Conference either on April 23, 2010, as scheduled, or on April 26, 2010, as noted in the online Supreme Court docket. [1] Court records also failed to show any record of service and notice to the parties of the purported denial. Information obtained from the imprisoned former US prosecutor Richard Fine, likewise, indicated that he had never received any notice and service at all of the purported denial. </p> <p>The Application was first submitted to Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy. The online Court docket noted denial by Justice Kennedy on March 12, 2010, and Richard Fine received a notice to that effect as well. However, the notice was by Counsel Danny Bickell, who was not authorized as a Deputy Clerk. Moreover, the notice was unsigned, and the copy in Court file was never stamped "FILED". Furthermore, there was no valid record of denial by Justice Kennedy to form the legal foundation for such notice. [2]</p> <p>Former US prosecutor Richard Fine then re-submitted the Application to Associate Justice Ruth Ginsburg, who in turn referred it to the US Supreme Court conference, scheduled for April 23, 2010.</p> <p>Prior to the April 23, 2010, Mr Danny Bickell, again - with no authority at all, eliminated from the court file records filed in the case, which included evidence, including, but not limited to details of his March 12, 2010 invalid notice of denial by Justice Kennedy. Mr Bickell's conduct relative to the March 12, 2010 notice and the consequent elimination of records from the Court file was subject of a complaint filed with US Attorney Office, Washington DC. [3]</p> <p>On April 23, 2010, outcome of the conference remained unknown. However, an April 26, 2010 note in the US Supreme Court online docket, [1] indicated denial of the Application. The records, which were obtained on July 26, 2010 from the Court file, showed no legal foundation at all for the April 26, 2010 denial note in the online Court docket. </p> <p>Therefore, it was alleged that the case documented the repeated publication of false and deliberately misleading notes in the online US Supreme Court docket, the issuing of false notices by unauthorized US Supreme Court staff relative to the purported March 12, 2010 denial by Justice Kennedy, and failure of the US Supreme Court Justices to dispose of matters before them.</p> <p>Former US prosecutor Richard Fine exposed, publicized, and rebuked the taking by judges in Los Angeles County of "not permitted" payments ("bribes"), which necessitated the signing on February 20, 2009 of "retroactive immunities" ("pardons") for all such judges. Since March 4, 2009, he has been imprisoned in solitary confinement in Los Angeles, California. Albeit, no warrant was ever issued, and no judgment/ conviction/ sentencing was ever entered in his case. </p> <p>The case of Richard Fine documented a pattern of publication of false records in online public access systems, and denial of access to true judicial records:<br> 1) The Los Angeles Superior Court - published a false online "Case Summary", but denied access to the Register of Actions (California civil docket) in the case management system of the court in the case.<br> 2) The Sheriff of Los Angeles County - published false online arrest and booking records in its "Inmate Information Center", but denied access to the true Los Angeles County Booking Record of Inmate Richard Fine.<br> 3) The US District Court, Los Angeles - published a false online "PACER docket", but denied access to the NEFs (Notices of Electronic Filing - the authentication records) in the case, and the paper record, which was Richard Fine's commencing record - the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, which was allegedly adulterated at the US District Court.<br> 4) The US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit - published a false online "PACER dockets", but denied access to the NDAs (Notices of Docket Activity - the authentication records), and also to critical records filed by respondents in the appeal.<br> 5) The US Supreme Court - published a false online "docket" noting March 12, 2010 and April 23/26, 2010 denials, which were not supported by the Court records in the case. Access to true dockets in the case management system of the Supreme Court was yet to be permitted.</p> <p>Notice of the newly discovered records of the US Supreme Court was also submitted to the US State Department and the United Nations. Review of such conduct by the courts was sought by Human Rights Alert as part of the pending review of Human Rights in the United States in the first ever UPR (universal periodic review) of Human Rights in the United States by the United Nations scheduled for November 2010. The April 2010 UPR report by Human Rights Alert, alleged large-scale fraud in online public access and case management systems of the courts in the United States. The report called for publicly and legally accountable validation of such systems. </p> <p>Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of online public access and case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States.</p> <p>LINKS<br> [1] 10-07-28-RE-Fine-v-Baca-09-A827-Additional-Evidence-for-Fraud-at-the-US-Supreme-Court-pertaining-to-purported-denial-of-the-Application-in-Confe<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/35014599/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/35014599/</a><br> [2] Alleged fraud in US Supreme Court records in Fine v Baca (09-A827)<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/34834530/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/34834530/</a><br> [3] Complaint against US Supreme Court Counsel Danny Bickell Alleged Public Corruption and Deprivation of Rights<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/33772313/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/33772313/</a> </p> <p>Joseph Zernik, PhD<br> Human Rights Alert (HRA), NGO<br> WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?<br> * "Innocent people remain in prison"<br> * "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."<br> LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) [i]<br> * "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."<br> Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) [ii]<br> * "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."<br> Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2000) [iii]<br> [i] LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/</a><br> [ii] Paper by Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/</a><br> [iii] Paper by Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/274339">http://www.scribd.com/doc/274339</a></p> <p>2010 UPR OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE UNITED STATES<br> April 19, 2010 Human Rights Alert submission for the 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States by the United Nations:<br> a) Press Release:<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/30200004/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/30200004/</a><br> b) Submission:<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/30147583/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/30147583/</a><br> c) Appendix:<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/30163613/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/30163613/</a><br> d) UPR Tool Kit by the Urban Justice Center:<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/29867561/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/29867561/</a> </p> <p> <small> <a href="http://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/29/10-07-29-additional-evidence-for-fraud-at-the-us-supreme-court-in-re-richard-fine-9065710/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p> misprision-of-clerkjudicial-corruptionhttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/29/10-07-29-additional-evidence-for-fraud-at-the-us-supreme-court-in-re-richard-fine-9065710/#commentshttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/25/10-07-25-william-suter-clerk-of-the-us-supreme-court-asked-to-certify-provide-copies-of-dockets-in-re-richard-fine-orly-taitz-9036690/tag:josephzernik.blog.co.uk,2010-07-25:/2010/07/25/10-07-25-william-suter-clerk-of-the-us-supreme-court-asked-to-certify-provide-copies-of-dockets-in-re-richard-fine-orly-taitz-9036690/Sun, 25 Jul 2010 19:11:37 +0200 <p><img src="http://inproperinla.com/pic-suterclearkscotus.jpg" alt="" title=""><br> William Suter<br> US Supreme Court Clerk<br> <strong>William Suter, Clerk of the US Supreme Court Asked to Certify, Provide Copies of Dockets in re: Richard Fine, Orly Taitz</strong><br> Los Angeles, July 25 – Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, filed request with William Suter, Clerk of the US Supreme Court to certify the online dockets of Applications pertaining to former US prosecutor Richard Fine and Attorney Orly Taitz, and provide copies of the dockets from the Court’s own case management system. [1]<br> Request pertained to Fine v Baca (09-A827) and Taitz v MacDonald (10-A56), applications for stay of executions, submitted to Justices Kennedy and Thomas, respectively.<br> Both applications originated from penalties imposed on counsel who represented clients in causes that were not favored by government.<br> In the former – Richard Fine exposed, publicized, and rebuked the secret taking by all Los Angeles Superior Court judges of “not permitted” payments (“bribes”), which necessitated the signing by the California governor of “retroactive immunities” (“pardons”). Richard Fine was arrested on March 4, 2010, and has been held in solitary confinement ever since. No warrant was ever issued in his case, and no judgment/conviction/sentencing was ever entered, as required by California Code to make it “effectual for any purpose”.<br> In the latter – Orly Taitz filed complaint pertaining to native, natural born citizenship of President Barack Obama. Serious sanctions were consequently imposed on her.<br> In both cases, denial of the applications were noted in online Court dockets and in letters by Counsel Danny Bickell. However, in both cases, review of the records [2] [3] raised serious concerns regarding contradictions, defects, and invalidity of both the dockets and the respective letters by Danny Bickell.<br> Moreover, the online public access system of Supreme Court dockets appeared as vague and ambiguous in both design and operation.<br> Human Rights Alert filed in April 2010 report with the United Nations, [4] as part of the first ever, 2010 review by the United Nation of Human rights in the United States, which focused on the role of invalid online public access and case management systems in undermining integrity of the courts. Responses by the US State Department to the United Nations are due by August 2010, and the United Nations review session and report are scheduled for November 2010.<br> Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States.<br> <strong>LINKS</strong><br> [1] <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/34835965/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/34835965/</a><br> [2] <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/34834530/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/34834530/</a><br> [3] <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/34835883/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/34835883/</a><br> [4] <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/30200004/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/30200004/</a><br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/30147583/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/30147583/</a><br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/30163613/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/30163613/</a><br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/29867561/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/29867561/</a> </p> <p> <small> <a href="http://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/25/10-07-25-william-suter-clerk-of-the-us-supreme-court-asked-to-certify-provide-copies-of-dockets-in-re-richard-fine-orly-taitz-9036690/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p> misprision-of-clerkhttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/25/10-07-25-william-suter-clerk-of-the-us-supreme-court-asked-to-certify-provide-copies-of-dockets-in-re-richard-fine-orly-taitz-9036690/#commentshttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/24/10-07-24-misprision-of-clerk-pure-and-honest-beyond-suspicion-the-clerks-and-the-emergence-of-executive-branch-supervision-of-the-federal-courts-9033044/tag:josephzernik.blog.co.uk,2010-07-24:/2010/07/24/10-07-24-misprision-of-clerk-pure-and-honest-beyond-suspicion-the-clerks-and-the-emergence-of-executive-branch-supervision-of-the-federal-courts-9033044/Sat, 24 Jul 2010 23:04:00 +0200 <p><img src="http://inproperinla.com/pic-suterclearkscotus.jpg" alt="" title=""><br> <em>William Suter<br> Clerk of the Supreme Court of the US</em><br> .<br> [no pic found]<br> .<br> <em>Terri Nafisi<br> Clerk of the US District Court, Central District of California</em><br> .<br> <img src="http://inproperinla.com/pic-clarke.jpg" alt="" title=""><br> <em>John A Clarke<br> Clerk of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles</em><br> .<br> <strong><br> Misprision of Clerks<br> Pure and Honest Beyond Suspicion: The Clerks and the Emergence of Executive Branch Supervision of the Federal Courts</strong><br> Historic review, linked below, [1] highlights the key role of Clerks of Court in integrity of the courts, or lack thereof. It also emphasizes the need for executive branch oversight of the clerks, which otherwise - left for supervision only by the judges who appointed them, are prone to corruption.</p> <p>The evidence is overwhelming of the central role of clerks of courts in corruption of the justice system in the United States today:</p> <p>a) At the Supreme Court of the US, Clerk WILLIAM SUTER permitted Counsel DANNY BICKELL to issues unsigned notices of denial of applications by the Justices, e.g. in Fine v Sheriff (09-A827), while not authorized as Deputy Clerk, and with no valid records to provide the foundation for such notices. Complaint alleging public corruption was filed with US Attorney Office, Washington DC. [3]</p> <p>b) At the US District Court, Central District of California, Clerk TERRI NAFISI permitted unauthorized personnel to construct the dockets and issue court minutes, orders, judgment in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) - the habeas corpus petition of Richard Fine. Clerk Nafisi now refuses to certify the docket as one that was constructed pursuant to the law of the US and by authority of the clerk.<br> Complaint alleging public corruption was filed with US Attorney Office, Los Angeles. [2]</p> <p>c) At the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, Clerk JOHN CLARKE ran certain litigations, such as Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737), where none of the judges were assigned, and where all court fees were falsely designated as "Journal Entry". Such practice was deemed by accountancy textbooks the cardinal sign of high level financial management fraud. Moreover, both the clerk and the presiding judge refused to disclose the ultimate designation of such funds, and the Clerk refuses to certify the dockets in such cases as ones that were conducted pursuant to the law of California.<br> Complaint alleging public corruption and real estate fraud by the court was filed with US Attorney Office, Los Angeles. [4]</p> <p>US Attorneys Office so far refuses to take action, or even acknowledge receipt of the complaints.</p> <p>Any help in identifying any cases in recent history, where either US or state court clerks were prosecuted by US Dept of Justice, would be greatly appreciated.</p> <p><strong>LINKS</strong><br> [1] <a href="http://inproperinla.com/10-07-23-order-in-th-court-history-of-clerks-of-us-courts.pdf">http://inproperinla.com/10-07-23-order-in-th-court-history-of-clerks-of-us-courts.pdf</a><br> [2] <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/34194403/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/34194403/</a><br> 10-07-12-Complaint-for-public-corruption-against-US-Magistrate-Carla-Woehrle-and-others-at-the-US-District-Court-Central-District-of-California-s<br> [3] <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/33772313/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/33772313/</a><br> 10-07-01-Complaint-against-US-Supreme-Court-Counsel-Danny-Bickell-Alleged-Public-Corruption-and-Deprivation-of-Rights-s<br> [4] <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/34504304/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/34504304/</a><br> 10-07-19-Complaint-filed-with-US-Attorney-Office-against-Judge-John-Segal-Clerk-John-Clarke-Attorney-David-Pasternak-Los-Angeles-Superior-Court-i</p> <p>Human Rights Alert (HRA), NGO<br> Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States.<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert">http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert</a><br> <a href="http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/">http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/</a><br> <a href="http://josephzernik.blog.co.uk/">http://josephzernik.blog.co.uk/</a><br> <a href="http://menchenrechte-los-angeles.blogspot.com/">http://menchenrechte-los-angeles.blogspot.com/</a><br> <a href="http://droitsdelhommealertelosangele.blogspot.com/">http://droitsdelhommealertelosangele.blogspot.com/</a><br> <a href="http://inproperinla.com/">http://inproperinla.com/</a><br> <a href="http://pressroom.prlog.org/Human_Rights_Alert/">http://pressroom.prlog.org/Human_Rights_Alert/</a><br> <a href="http://ireport.cnn.com/people/HumanRightsA?numResults=10&view=documents">http://ireport.cnn.com/people/HumanRightsA?numResults=10&view=documents</a><br> <a href="http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine">http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine</a> </p> <p><strong>WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?</strong><br> * "Innocent people remain in prison"<br> * "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."<br> LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) [i]<br> * "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."<br> Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) [ii]<br> * "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."<br> Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2000) [iii]<br> [i] LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/</a><br> [ii] Paper by Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/</a><br> [iii] Paper by Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/274339">http://www.scribd.com/doc/274339</a><br> ____________<br> <strong>Pure and Honest Beyond Suspicion: The<br> Clerks and the Emergence of Executive<br> Branch Supervision of the Federal Courts,<br> 1839-1869</strong><br> As the federal government attempted to centralize its operations and<br> to regulate the conduct of its officers during the three decades spanning<br> the middle of the nineteenth century, the clerks� relationship to<br> that government was transformed. This transformation was effected by<br> three separate legislative initiatives: a resolution requiring the clerks to<br> submit regular reports of their fees to the Secretary of the Treasury; a<br> pair of laws limiting the total amount of fees each clerk was allowed to<br> retain; and another law establishing a uniform fee schedule. This section<br> describes these initiatives in more detail while providing an account<br> of some of the difficulties encountered by officials within the<br> executive branch in enforcing them.<br> The Reporting Requirement of 1839<br> The need for some kind of oversight of the clerks and the fee system<br> had been apparent since at least 1818, when it was discovered that<br> Theron Rudd, the clerk of the District Court for the Southern District<br> of New York, had absconded with more than $117,000 he had embezzled<br> from the court.4 7 The incident exposed the inherent problem of<br> entrusting court administration to fee-collecting clerks supervised<br> almost exclusively by the judges who appointed them.4 8 </p> <p> <small> <a href="http://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/24/10-07-24-misprision-of-clerk-pure-and-honest-beyond-suspicion-the-clerks-and-the-emergence-of-executive-branch-supervision-of-the-federal-courts-9033044/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p> judicial-corruptionhttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/24/10-07-24-misprision-of-clerk-pure-and-honest-beyond-suspicion-the-clerks-and-the-emergence-of-executive-branch-supervision-of-the-federal-courts-9033044/#commentshttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/22/10-07-22-complaint-filed-against-california-court-of-appeal-2nd-district-public-corruption-racketeering-9021378/tag:josephzernik.blog.co.uk,2010-07-22:/2010/07/22/10-07-22-complaint-filed-against-california-court-of-appeal-2nd-district-public-corruption-racketeering-9021378/Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:03:18 +0200 <p> Los Angles, July 22 – complaint [1] was filed with US Attorney Office, Central District of California, by Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, against Justices and the Clerk of the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District - alleging public corruption in three pretense appeals originating from a pretense litigation in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737), which proceeded from 1998 to 2006, and was alleged in a previous complaint as real estate fraud and racketeering by the Courts.<br> Justices DANIEL CURRY, CHARLES VOGEL, J HASTINGS, AND NORMAN EPSTEIN, Clerk of the Court of Appeals JOSEPH LANE, and Attorneys RICHARD GREEN (Green & Marker), MITCHEL J. EZER (Ezer Williamson & Brown), and DAVID PASTERNAK (Pasternak, Pasternak, Patton) – were listed as accused of public corruption and deprivation of rights in conduct amounting to racketeering by the Courts in three pretense appeals in Galdjie v Darwish - B163970, B179667, and B191327.<br> Previous complaint detailed conduct of the Los Angeles Superior Court - where a group of Judges and the Clerk colluded to take the 6-unit Santa Monica rental property of Defendant Darwish. The hallmark of the alleged fraud at the Superior Court was in directing Defendant Darwish in May 2002, on a day that Jury Trial appeared was schedule at the Court, to proceed to the Municipal Court of Culver City, where an anonymous “Muni Judge” conducted a pretense “Court Trial” and falsely represented entering judgment in the case. Defendant Darwish provided a declaration that it was Judge John Segal.<br> Superior Court records showed that neither a Judgment, nor an Appealable Order was ever entered in the manner required by California law to make it “effectual for any purpose”.<br> .<br> <strong>Table 1:</strong> Appealable events in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) as falsely recorded in the Register of Actions (California civil docket), Los Angeles Superior Court<br> .<br> Date -Judge- - - - Nature of Judicial Record or Proceeding- -Comments<br> .<br> 1 05/20/02 “Muni Judge” Ruling on Submitted Matter Alleged fraud in registration of a judgment. “As to the first cause of action, the court enters judgment in favor of defendants and against plaintiff…”<br> .<br> 2 05/07/04 Segal, John Hearing-Other Alleged fraud in registration of an Order Appointing Receiver.</p> <p>The California Court of Appeal, 2nd District ran three (3) pretense appeals in the case – two of them were denied, and the third was voluntarily dismissed.<br> California law is clear regarding jurisdiction the Court of Appeal to conduct appeals only in entered judgments, when Notice of Appeal was filed within 60 days from the Date of Entry of Judgment or Appealable Order.<br> Records of the Court of Appeals, 2nd District showed:<br> a) The first appeal was listed as originating from a “Judgment Date” of September 5, 2002, a date on which neither proceeding nor filing was listed at the Superior Court. The respective date of Notice of Appeal was listed as December 19, 2002.<br> b) The second appeal was listed with no “Judgment Date” at all.<br> c) The third appeal was listed as originating from a “Judgment Date” of April 26, 2006. The only proceeding or filing at the Superior Court on that date was “Plaintiff’s Ex-Parte Application To Extend Time To Close Escrow” – not an appealable court action.<br> .<br> <strong>Table 2:</strong> Appeals in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) as falsely recorded in the online public access system of the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District<br> Appeal # -“Judgment Date” *- -Notice--Trial Court- -Cal Court-Disposition<br> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Judge- - - - -Appeal Justices<br> .<br> 1 B163970 09/05/02 12/19/02 Segal, John Curry, Daniel Affirmed in full<br> Vogel, Charles Final<br> Hastings, J. Signed Published<br> 113 Cal.App.4th 1331<br> .<br> 2 B179667 None Listed 11/24/04 Segal, John Curry, Daniel Affirmed in full<br> Epstein, Norman Final<br> Hastings, J.<br> .<br> 3 B191327 04/26/06 05/18/06 Segal, John None Listed Voluntary dismissal<br> Final<br> * The public access system of the California Court of Appeal does not list any Dates of Entry of Judgments<br> .<br> The complaint alleged that the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District, in such pretense appeals committed numerous serious violations of the law.<br> The complaint further alleged that the California Court of Appeals, 2nd District, through a series of decisions over more than a decade colluded with the Los Angeles Superior Court in ambiguation of both entry of judgment and notice of entry of judgment, and jointly, the Courts created conditions that enabled racketeering, as detailed in the complaint.<br> The complaint further alleged that in such pretense appeals, the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District, joined forces with the Los Angeles Superior Court in efforts to establish “oral modifications of real estate contracts” as permitted by law. Los Angeles County was distinguished already in the early 2000s in FBI reports as “ the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud”. The complaint alleged that the Courts themselves were central to propelling the County to such distinction.<br> The complaint further noted that the online public access system of the California Courts of Appeals failed to include any registration of the Dates of Entry of Judgments. Therefore, the online public access system was alleged as fraud by design an in operation, and the enabling tool for racketeering by the Courts.<br> The complaint against the California Court of Appeals, 2nd District, was copied to the United Nations and the US State Department, as part of the first ever, 2010 review by the United Nation of Human rights in the United States. Responses by the US State Department to the United Nations are due by August 2010, and the United Nations review session and report are scheduled for November 2010.<br> Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States.</p> <p><strong>LINKS</strong><br> [1] 10-07-22-Complaint-filed-with-US-Attorney-Office-against-the-California-Court-of-Appeal-2nd-District-in-Re-Public-Corruption-racketeering-in-Galdj<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/34725529/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/34725529/</a></p> <p>CC:<br> 1) Prof David Burcham – former Dean, Loyola Law School<br> 2) Prof Erwin Chemerinsky – Dean, Irvine Law School<br> 3) Attorney Connie Rice – Los Angeles Advancement Project<br> 4) UPR Office of the United Nations<br> 5) UPR Office of the US State Department:<br> 6) The Honorable Dianne Feinstein – Senator from California<br> 7) US Senate and House of Representatives – Judiciary Committees</p> <p>WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?<br> * "Innocent people remain in prison"<br> * "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."<br> LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) [i]<br> * "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."<br> Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) [ii]<br> * "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."<br> Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2000) [iii]<br> [i] LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/</a><br> [ii] Paper by Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/</a><br> [iii] Paper by Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/274339">http://www.scribd.com/doc/274339</a> </p> <p> <small> <a href="http://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/22/10-07-22-complaint-filed-against-california-court-of-appeal-2nd-district-public-corruption-racketeering-9021378/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p> californiafalse-imprisonmentslos-angeles-countyjudicial-corruptionhttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/22/10-07-22-complaint-filed-against-california-court-of-appeal-2nd-district-public-corruption-racketeering-9021378/#commentshttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/21/un-human-rights-council-date-wed-21-jul-2010-9011975/tag:josephzernik.blog.co.uk,2010-07-21:/2010/07/21/un-human-rights-council-date-wed-21-jul-2010-9011975/Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:11:33 +0200 <p><img src="http://inproperinla.com/pic-UN%20Human%20Rights%20Council.jpg" alt="" title=""><br> UN Human Rights Council<br> Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 12:44:55 +0300To: <a href="mailto:lawsters@googlegroups.comFrom:">lawsters@googlegroups.comFrom:</a> joseph zernik<br> <strong>Subject: Re: 10-07-18 Complaint filed with US Attorn ey Office against<br> Judge John Segal, Los Angeles Superior - for public corruption, racketeering. </strong><br> Cc: "Smith, Darcy (USMS)" , "Shell, Thomas(USMS)" </p> <p>Dear Joe:<br> Your response reflects both ignorance, and condescending approach towards other nations, which is out of place.<br> The facts speak for themselves -<br> The Russian Federation alone, downloaded over 60,000 records from my archives [1]from January to July 2010.<br> Mind you the archive is not a user friendly site by any stretch of imagination.<br> I have no idea what triggered their interest, but I can guess. The archives include records of a number of key cases showing the tight link between corruption at the courtrooms and the current financial crisis - the harms inflicted on the US and world-wide through the US Judiciary-Banking Complex.<br> I believe that any other economic/intelligence agency of governments in Europe should be interested in the archive as well. After all, the failure of the US to enforce the law on US financial institutions will end up costing the EU trillions of dollars, through undermining the economies of Greece, Spain, Portugal, and UK.<br> Regarding other "third world countries": Again - I can only guess. However, given the US ongoing posturing, for decades, that it is the world's Human Rights enforcer, third world countries, including those who were subjected to US invasions under the guise of Human Rights enforcement are surely interested....<br> Corruption in the courts is severe violation of Human Rights. That is what the US purports to waive as its banner. The US State Department has published for decades annual reviews, judging the Human Rights records of any other nation around the globe. This year, for the first time, we are playing role reversal, with the 2010 UPR, the rest of the world will be reporting on the US Human Rights record. It is surely going to be a show worth watching.<br> However, we, residents and citizens of the US, have the right and civic duty to provide the evidence to the reviewers, and trigger the interests of people world-wide in the unprecedented levels of corruption at the US Courts.<br> In case you are not aware, some "third world countries" are going to be among those who hold a vote in the November 2010 UPR review session at the Human Rights Council of the United Nations.<br> As stated by Erwin Chemerinsky, Founding Dean of the University of California Irvine Law School, regarding the justice system in Los Angeles County, California:"This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."In case you don't remember, the world was very interested in Guantanamo Bay, the world was likewise interested in Abu-Ghreib. Here we show the same phenomena in the territorial United States - in Los Angeles, California.The images below represent visitors from one site only.<br> Joseph Zernik[1] Archives:<br> <a href="http://inproperinla.com/">http://inproperinla.com/</a><br> The images below show only unique visitors, in one site only.</p> <p><strong>At 11:13 PM 7/20/2010, Joe wrote:</strong><br> Good luck to you, please let us know when someone in a third world country cares about what is happening in U.S. courtrooms.<br> Joe</p> <p><strong>In a message dated 7/20/2010 12:15:31 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, <a href="mailto:jz12345@earthlink.net">jz12345@earthlink.net</a> writes:<br> </strong>You did not do the same at all.<br> I am not trying to engage in any legal process, it is futile.<br> I am trying to increase international awareness of the level of corruption of the US justice system, and the large-scale abuse of the people by the US government, which is refusing to prosecute racketeering judges.<br> I have readers from over 85 nations following my web sites, and hundreds of thousands reads in the past half year alone...</p> <p><strong>At 04:32 PM 7/20/2010, Joe wrote:<br> </strong><br> I totally understand what you are trying to do. I did the same thing and made the evidence public record when I attached the evidence to a Writ of Mandamus. The case was dismissed for reasons some of which were in the case record. The facts as they are are irrelevant if nobody listens and nobody is listening to you otherwise something would have already happened. If you like beating your head against the wall keep up the good work. </p> <p>Joe </p> <p>In a message dated 7/20/2010 12:45:20 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, <a href="mailto:jz12345@earthlink.net">jz12345@earthlink.net</a> writes: </p> <p>You again entirely fail to understand me. </p> <p>I am only documenting and publishing the facts as they are. </p> <p><strong>At 02:08 AM 7/20/2010, Joe wrote: </strong></p> <p>I have walked in your shoes, for many years, each day hoping that I could find "justice" only to think "well maybe tomorrow" but tomorrow has never come. </p> <p>good luck, </p> <p>Joe </p> <p><strong>In a message dated 7/19/2010 6:09:09 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, <a href="mailto:jz12345@earthlink.net">jz12345@earthlink.net</a> writes:<br> </strong><br> Dear Joe </p> <p>I hope that you would not be disappointed, if I tell you that you are not "raining on my parade". </p> <p>I never expected the US Attorney to do anything. I have recorded the corruption up to the Director of US Attorneys Office at Washington DC and Assistant Director of FBI, who in response to inquiry by Senator Feinstein on my behalf on this matter, provided responses that I deem fraud by US Dept of Justice on the US Congress. </p> <p>The intention in filing and publishing the complaints is to document the level of corruption of the US Justice system in conjunction with the first ever, 2010 review of Human Rights in the United States by the United Nations. </p> <p>There is full documentation of racketeering by the courts. It is criminal conduct, which is not covered by any immunity at all. The judges involved were not acting under assignment - therefore, it was extra-judicial conduct. Moreover, the evidence that I provided showed that the Clerk would not even certify certain cases as litigations of the Superior Court. Moreover, Defendant declared that her counsel informed her from the start that such cases were heard by an "Equity Court", where she had no right for jury trial. </p> <p>There is no doubt that "Muni-Judge" of the Culver City Municipal Court - John Segal was engaging in something that was outside his judicial capacity in conducting an impromptu "Court Trial" in a civil unlimited case from the Superior Court and deciding to take the Defendant's 6-unit rental property. As listed in the complaint there was no judgment ever entered in the case, either. Albeit, the fraudulent online "Case Summary" purported to create that pretense. </p> <p>It also explains my comments that the whole discussion on this site of immunity as a key issue in the US justice system is simply hot air... There is no immunity for such criminal conduct by judges, there is only refusal of the US Department of Justice to put an end to racketeering by judges, which continues in full force all across the United States. </p> <p>JZ </p> <p><strong>At 11:41 PM 7/19/2010, Joe wrote: </strong> </p> <p>I will rain on your parade and tell you the US Attny, DOJ and courts could care less about your complaints. I have been there and speak from experience. You would be better off trying to get some media outlet to tell your story or go to political town hall meetings and raise your issue. Most media outlets do not want to get involved because they fear reprisals during future litigation but you might find some bold reporter. </p> <p>good luck, </p> <p>Joe </p> <p><strong>In a message dated 7/18/2010 7:39:35 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, <a href="mailto:jz12345@earthlink.net">jz12345@earthlink.net</a> writes:<br> </strong>10-07-18 Complaint filed with US Attorney Office against John Segal - Judge, John A Clarke – Clerk, Attorney David Pasternak and others at thhe Los Angeles Superior Court, alleging public corruption in Re: Conduct of pretense litigation in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) real estate fraud by the Court. </p> <p> <small> <a href="http://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/21/un-human-rights-council-date-wed-21-jul-2010-9011975/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p> californiafalse-imprisonmentsjudicial-corruptionlos-angeles-countyhttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/21/un-human-rights-council-date-wed-21-jul-2010-9011975/#commentshttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/19/10-07-18-complaint-filed-v-judge-j-segal-attorney-d-pasternak-la-superior-court-for-public-corruption-8998855/tag:josephzernik.blog.co.uk,2010-07-19:/2010/07/19/10-07-18-complaint-filed-v-judge-j-segal-attorney-d-pasternak-la-superior-court-for-public-corruption-8998855/Mon, 19 Jul 2010 02:05:52 +0200 <p>Judge John Segal</p> <p>Attorney David Pasternak</p> <p><strong>10-07-18 Complaint filed with US Attorney Office against John Segal – Judge, John A Clarke – Clerk, Attorney David Pasternak and others at the Los Angeles Superior Court, alleging public corruption in Re: Conduct of pretense litigation in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) – real estate fraud by the Court.</strong><br> Executive Summary [1]<br> Los Angles, July 18 – complaint was filed with US Attorney Office, Central District of California, by Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, against John Segal – Judge, John A Clarke – Clerk, Attorney David Pasternak – former President of the Los Angles County Bar Association, and others of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, alleging public corruption and deprivation of rights relative to their conduct in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737).</p> <p>The complaint named as co-conspirators all attorneys who appeared in the case, including, but not limited to Plaintiff’s Counsel Richard Green and Defendant’s Counsel Rhonda Walker.</p> <p>The complaint alleged that the named accused conspired to conduct pretense litigation, to employ the Court’s fraudulent case management system – Sustain - in generating fraudulent court records, and to take Defendant’s property – a 6-unit rental property in Santa Monica - under the color of law.</p> <p>The complaint further alleged that the case of Galdjie v Darwish, in and of itself, held sufficient evidence for prosecution of judges, clerks, attorneys, and the Los Angeles Superior Court itself for racketeering – conduct of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity.</p> <p>The case proceeded from 1998 to 2006, by a group of judges, who presided with no Assignment Orders and with no authority at all, juggling the case back and forth among them. Judgments were falsely represented as entered, and a Receiver - David Pasternak - was falsely represented as appointed by the court.</p> <p>The minutes as registered in Sustain showed routine back-dating - at times by half a year or more, and also the “waiving” of notice and service and failure to have the minutes authenticated by the clerks. Therefore, all such records were alleged as void, not voidable.</p> <p>The Register of Actions (California civil docket) in Sustain showed the listing of numerous dates for jury trial, repeatedly continued. However, Defendant declared that her counsel had informed her at the onset of the litigation that the case would be heard by an ”Equity Court”. Therefore, she had been told that she would not be eligible for a jury trial at all. The Register of Actions also provided evidence of routine false registrations of numerous actions in the case.</p> <p>On May 13, 2002 the Register of Actions again listed jury trial in the case. However, Defendant declared that upon arriving at the Santa Monica Courthouse of the Superior Court of California, she was instructed to proceed to the Culver City Municipal Court.</p> <p>The Register of Actions noted that on the same afternoon a “Court Trial” was conducted by a judge who remained anonymous, listed in the Register only a “Muni-Judge”. However, Defendant declared that it was Judge John Segal, who acted with no authority at all.</p> <p>Attorney David Pasternak later acted as “Receiver” in the case. However, the hearing of a motion and the order for his appointment of receiver, were falsely registered. The Register of Actions also showed that no writ of execution was ever issued in the case.</p> <p>Regardless, David Pasternak took Defendant’s property, under the color of law, and conveyed it into possession of Plaintiff. However, no conveyance of title was ever found in searching the records of the Los Angeles County Registrar/ Recorder.</p> <p>The Register of Actions further showed that all court fees in the case, without exception, were listed as “Journal Entry”, whereas in other cases of the Court they were listed in the Registers as “Filing Fees”, “Motion Fees”, “Stipulation Fees”, etc. Presiding Judge Charles McCoy and Clerk of the Court John A Clarke refused to disclose the ultimate designation of the funds collected in the case. It should be noted that accountancy textbooks consider misuse of “Journal Entry” registration as a cardinal sign of high-level financial management fraud.</p> <p>Presiding Judge Charles McCoy and Clerk of the Court also denied access to the paper court file in the case and to various Sustain records – alleged in the complaint as violation of First Amendment Rights and an ongoing effort to cover-up alleged criminality by the Court.</p> <p>The Clerk of the Court John Clarke also refused to certify the case as litigation conducted by the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles.<br> The case was claimed as holding unique public policy significance: It provided detailed evidence of the conduct of pretense litigations at the Los Angeles Superior Court and of real estate fraud by the Los Angeles Superior Court, which was alleged as central to propelling Los Angeles County to its distinction by the FBI as “the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud”.</p> <p>Moreover, the case provided detailed evidence of efforts by the Court to establish the law as permitting “oral modifications of real estate contracts”- which would no doubt increase the incidents of real estate fraud in Los Angeles County even further.</p> <p>The complaint further alleged that the case presented unique evidence of the tight linkage between corruption of the courts and corruption of the legal profession in Los Angeles County, California.<br> In addition, the case provided detailed evidence of the central role of the Court’s case management system – Sustain - in conducting of pretense litigations, through fraudulent registrations of actions and minutes. Sustain was installed at the Los Angeles Superior Court circa 1985, at a time that today’s California Supreme Court Chief Justice Ronald George served in leadership positions at the Court.</p> <p>The case also provided detailed evidence of the refusal so far of the US and the California government to address alleged racketeering by judges of the Los Angeles Superior Court. Complaints regarding fraud committed by the Superior Court in the case of Galdjie v Darwish and other similar cases, were previously filed with California Attorney General and gubernatorial aspirant Jerry Brown. Jerry Brown, who was recently quoted by media a “appalled by corruption”, refused to initiate any corrective actions. FBI, likewise, has so far refused to investigate such allegations.</p> <p>Conduct of the Los Angeles Superior Court and the Los Angeles Justice system were described already in 2001 by Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Founding Dean of the University of California Irvine Law School, as “conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states…”, and the Blue Ribbon Review Panel recommended already in 2006 external investigation of the Los Angeles Superior Court. Regardless, the April 2010 report, filed by Human Rights Alert with the United Nations, documented ongoing refusal of senior officers of the US Department of Justice to enforce the law in Los Angles County, California, and to accord equal protection to its 10 million residents.</p> <p>The complaint was copied to the United Nations and the US State Department, as part of the first ever, 2010 review by the United Nation of Human rights in the United States. Responses by the US State Department to the United Nations are due by August 2010, and the United Nations review session and report are scheduled for November 2010.</p> <p>Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States.</p> <p><strong>LINKS:</strong><br> [1] 10-07-19-Complaint-filed-with-US-Attorney-Office-in-Re-Public-Corruption-in-Galdjie-v-Darwish-SC052737-s<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/34504304/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/34504304/</a></p> <p>WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?<br> * "Innocent people remain in prison"<br> * "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."<br> LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) [i]<br> * "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."<br> Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) [ii]<br> * "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."<br> Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2000) [iii]<br> <strong>LINKS</strong><br> [i] LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/</a><br> [ii] Paper by Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/</a><br> [iii] Paper by Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/274339">http://www.scribd.com/doc/274339</a> </p> <p> <small> <a href="http://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/19/10-07-18-complaint-filed-v-judge-j-segal-attorney-d-pasternak-la-superior-court-for-public-corruption-8998855/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p> los-angeles-countyfalse-imprisonmentscaliforniajudicial-corruptionhttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/19/10-07-18-complaint-filed-v-judge-j-segal-attorney-d-pasternak-la-superior-court-for-public-corruption-8998855/#commentshttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/19/10-07-18-more-from-the-oak-discussion-board-8998826/tag:josephzernik.blog.co.uk,2010-07-18:/2010/07/19/10-07-18-more-from-the-oak-discussion-board-8998826/Mon, 19 Jul 2010 01:49:03 +0200 <p><strong>Comment by Joseph Zernik, Los Angeles, CA just now</strong><br> Delete CommentDear Lynette: As for the solution - the evidence from Los Angeles County, and beyond, in the past couple of decades shows that we cannot expect it to come from the United States government. The highest level officers of the US Department of Justice are fully informed on corruption of the judiciary in Los Angeles County, California. Yet, they refuse to take action, even when prodded by US Congress. It has therefore been Human Rights Alert's policy for sometime to focus its efforts on increasing international awareness of the level of abuse that US citizens are subjected to by their own government. Hundreds of thousands of reads and downloads from Human Rights Alert were registered from over 85 nations around the globe. Between now and November 2010, our efforts should be focused on lobbying nations who sit on the Human Rights Council of the United Nations - to affect an honest and effectual report by the United Nations in its first ever review of Humane Rights in the United States. [1] We must define specific areas of abuse, such as false imprisonments - the focus of Human Rights Alert's report, the intimidation of Human Rights counsel - the focus of OAK's report, or the retaliation against whistle-blowers - the focus of ITHACA's report. With it, we must propose specific goals and effective corrective actions, which should be easily monitored, which the report would request the United States to undertake between 2010 and the next review - in 2014. It is not that such report is the end all in the matter. However, such report is very likely to get publicity, which is much wider than anything that we may be able to generate on our own. jz LINKS [1] 10-04-24-The-Road-Ahead-from-April-to-the-November-2010-review-of-the-US-Human-Rights-by-the-United-Nations shttp://www.scribd.com/doc/31433805/</p> <p><strong>Comment by Joseph Zernik, Los Angeles, CA just now</strong><br> Delete CommentDear Dr Jackson: . The case of Richard Fine was used only as an example. The vast majority of the victims are blacks and latinos, and about a third of them were estimated to have been still juveniles at the time of their false imprisonment. . As quoted in the paper forwarded to you some weeks ago: 1) Reports by PBS in 2001 related to the Rampart scandal investigation (1998-2000) provided various estimates of the number of those who were falsely imprisoned in Los Angeles County as 8,000 to 30,000. 2) Unofficial report by Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Founding Dean of the UC Irvine Law School, and renowned constitutional scholar in 2001 stated upon review of the matter: “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.” 3) Unofficial report by Prof David Burcham, Dean of Loyola Los Angeles Law School in 2001 stated: “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." 4) Official report by the Blue Ribbon Review Panel stated in 2006: "Innocent people remain in prison". It also recommended "external investigation" of the Los Angeles Superior Court, which the US government so far has refused to conduct. , In view of the above, I would be grateful if you could please likewise provide the references to the "general proposition of accountants, historians, journalists, gumshoes, etc. checking against paper, receipts, and original records." . As far as I could tell, you were making baseless statements by the seat of your pants, in a matter that is, based on solid evidence, a Human Rights disgrace of historic proportions. . Truly, Joseph Zernik, PhD</p> <p>Human Rights Alert (HRA), NGOhttp://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert <a href="http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/http://josephzernik.blog.co.uk/">http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/http://josephzernik.blog.co.uk/</a> <a href="http://menchenrechte-los-angeles.blogspot.com/http://droitsdelhommealertelosangele.blogspot.com/">http://menchenrechte-los-angeles.blogspot.com/http://droitsdelhommealertelosangele.blogspot.com/</a> <a href="http://inproperinla.com/">http://inproperinla.com/</a> <a href="http://pressroom.prlog.org/Human_Rights_Alert/">http://pressroom.prlog.org/Human_Rights_Alert/</a> <a href="http://ireport.cnn.com/people/HumanRightsA?numResults=10&view=documents">http://ireport.cnn.com/people/HumanRightsA?numResults=10&view=documents</a> <a href="http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine">http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine</a></p> <p>Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States.<br> <strong>Comment by c. lynnette thomas 59 minutes ago</strong><br> so, with all this blogging and boggling, exposing the issues, where is the chattering about viable solutions? I very much support the idea that comments here should be kept under the 250 word limit rule, as comments and blogs are a might different. anything more that needs said in a comment, a link can be provided to the corresponding blog. that way, we'll be able to sort through all the info with much more ease and, together, devise strategies to begin to resolve the many issues. I would love to aid in that endeavor, but get rather lost in the exhausting comments here. just some thoughts on how to streamline things here and make it more productively functional for all our purposes! <img src="/img/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="middle" border="0"><br> <strong>Comment by Dr. A. D. Jackson 5 hours ago</strong><br> I only stated a general proposition of accountants, historians, journalists, gumshoes, etc. checking against paper, receipts, and original records. I did not imply Richard Fine's papers were in order as I have extreme misgivings concerning his being locked up. Andrew<br> <img src="http://inproperinla.com/pic-hra-ogo.jpg" alt="" title=""><br> <img src="http://inproperinla.com/pic-clustermap.jpg" alt="" title=""> </p> <p> <small> <a href="http://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/19/10-07-18-more-from-the-oak-discussion-board-8998826/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p> judicial-corruptioncalifornialos-angeleshttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/19/10-07-18-more-from-the-oak-discussion-board-8998826/#commentshttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/18/comment-by-joseph-zernik-los-angeles-ca-9-hours-ago-8996262/tag:josephzernik.blog.co.uk,2010-07-18:/2010/07/18/comment-by-joseph-zernik-los-angeles-ca-9-hours-ago-8996262/Sun, 18 Jul 2010 15:44:04 +0200 <p><img src="http://api.ning.com/files/MD4vwdnwgkjieYL-fVJ5hHUZCyGb4FtVgYEpylBFaX1PFOAfYe0nZtYxSuFe9XPA7hWqUgBNNdjlkwNv9InO5jyFjjym5Qct/Zernik_Joseph_portrait_100126_500.jpg?width=48&height=48&crop=1%3A1" alt="" title=""><br> <img src="http://api.ning.com/files/YY2IyBhTFlUsl8j5MGlXccRraxpVTPFM6kR6Re09w47vjCW*NnI*yF9uyCsQ0LgefV0YG02vSSD4WM*zdAJSsWlakaAksAaA/FINE.jpg" alt="" title=""><br> <img src="http://api.ning.com/files/*n*2ArDEGZdZ5yNI5bSYI80JxpOaP-0wFmiGzVvRqyY2FktL7YLR-ehbpoa*rtaGDejNG3pXf*Nz1NfeSSFTYPls0zyqf-QB/fineorange.jpg" alt="" title=""><br> <strong>Comment by Joseph Zernik, Los Angeles, CA 9 hours ago<br> Delete Comment</strong><br> Please sign the petition - FREE RICHARD FINE . Dear Dr Jackson: With all due respect, your comments below, are alarming, since they grossly misrepresent the findings of my study [1]: a) The "underlying papers: are not good. As best documented in the case of Richard Fine. [2] Media widely reported a March 4, 2009 "sentencing hearing". However, no such hearing was ever registered by the court. Media widely reported that Richard Fine was imprisoned based on a "March 4, 2009 Judgment for Contempt", However, not such judgment was ever entered by the court, as required by California Code to make "effectual for any purpose". No warrant was issued in the case either. Furthermore, the Sheriff insisted, in response to official inquiry by Los Angeles County Supervisor on producing fraudulent records, indicating that Richard Fine was arrested on location and by authority of the Municipal Court of San Pedro, which has not existed for almost a decade. In contrast, as part of the habeas corpus petition of Richard Fine, the Sheriff produced a false on its face judgment of the Superior Court, County of Los Angeles, City of Los Angeles, which was stamped on its face "FILED" on March 4, 2009, but signed on its last face by Judge Yaffe on March 24, 2009, and was never authenticated and never entered. b) Regarding any claim that such fraudulent records were the result of shortage of funds - (i) the Sheriff refused to correct the false records, even after their fraudulent nature was brought to his attention - there simply are no valid records for the arrest and imprisonment. (ii) A control study of another Los Angeles County registration system - the catalog of the law library - found it close to perfection. In short: I find it disappointing that you try to make false excuse for the large scale false imprisonments in Los Angeles County, which were documented in official, unofficial, and media reports for over a decade. Your assertions were based on no data at all - only speculations. Joseph Zernik [1] Data mining as a civil duty - prisoners' registration systems <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/33520723/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/33520723/</a> [2] The various records in Richard Fine's case are linked in the petition - Free Richard Fine: <a href="http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine">http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine</a><br> <img src="http://api.ning.com/files/*x-cKnxQBBkS7*RNiVK*mX1Hf-FvezB1Ai*qKDawsf7IlTmCY6vvitiPF4IXLx0PqkmvpKsEIOv*HRsOhHezV0uCW4N3XtfB/HRALogo.jpg" alt="" title=""><br> <img src="http://api.ning.com/files/GYavQXT*GMkeCPWVip30T2-tkDnPFVxBRhQkJHzo7Ihj6XFTJ0cI1KwjJMqqBeIQRjNSfrT4nnYPALlO6VL8ml4XeeVCN-xE/clustermap100707.jpg" alt="" title=""><br> .<br> <img src="http://api.ning.com/files/Sjnl7UTGQbHAgM11Z1l7r3XaGTjktybJ1YP33*VOgA-E59dwPpk0c6nrF8CDcLCTy*bJjkStgUWmZK-W3scZvoA-ZWmQYBke/Andrew1.jpg?width=48&height=48&crop=1%3A1" alt="" title=""><br> <strong>Comment by Dr. A. D. Jackson 10 hours ago</strong><br> Hello Everyone, Lunch Under the OAK and other sources pointed out that L A County's records system for tracking court proceedings and finding the whereabouts of the incarcerated is very inaccurate. Given that California is broke, it's hard to see when that will all get fixed. It does make the process difficult, looking through papers and going from lock up to lockup, but if the underlying paper is good , it does not constitute false imprisonment. Ultimately we tend to fall back on original paper. It has long been a policy even under the old common law to have public trials and not to secrete inmates, so I understand the concern. On occasion we get something like Operation Greylord of the early 80s where some 10% of the judges in the Circuit Court of Cook County (Chicago) were convicted of bribery and other judicial misconduct. Cook County is not the only court system needing probing, and that we don't have more Greylords is unfortunate. Andrew </p> <p> <small> <a href="http://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/18/comment-by-joseph-zernik-los-angeles-ca-9-hours-ago-8996262/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p> judicial-corruptionfalse-imprisonmentslos-angeles-countycaliforniahttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/18/comment-by-joseph-zernik-los-angeles-ca-9-hours-ago-8996262/#commentshttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/17/10-07-17-complaint-by-michael-paul-against-california-administrative-office-of-the-courts-alleging-public-corruption-and-racketeering-by-californ-8993435/tag:josephzernik.blog.co.uk,2010-07-17:/2010/07/17/10-07-17-complaint-by-michael-paul-against-california-administrative-office-of-the-courts-alleging-public-corruption-and-racketeering-by-californ-8993435/Sat, 17 Jul 2010 20:38:12 +0200 <p><img src="http://inproperinla.com/pic-george-ronald.jpg" alt="" title=""><br> Ronald George<br> Chief Justice of California Supreme Court<br> Complaint by Michael Paul against California Administrative Office of the Courts, alleging public corruption and racketeering by California Chief Justice Ronald George filed with the United Nations as part of 2010 review of Human Rights in the United States.<br> Los Angeles, July 17 – Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, filed with the United Nations and US State Department copy of complaint filed by Michael Paul, former employee of the California Administrative Office of the Courts, alleging public corruption by the California Courts and California Supreme Court Chief Justice Ronald George. [1] [2]<br> Human Rights Alert asked the US Department of Justice and the United Nations to accept the complaint as additional evidence of widespread corruption of the California courts. Widespread corruption of the courts and large-scale false imprisonments in Los Angeles County, California, were the focus of the Human Rights Alert April 2010 report to the United Nations.<br> In letter to plaintiff Michael Paul, Dr Zernik noted that former's complaint was consistent with complaints filed in recent weeks by Human Rights Alert with the US Attorney Office against Ronald George, California Judicial Council, judges and clerks of the Superior Court of California,alleging widespread corruption. Dr Zernik added that he had no doubt that upon review of the body of the complaints as a whole, any competent court of jurisdiction would conclude that judges of the Superior Court of California were engaged in racketeering for at least a decade or two. Moreover, Dr Zernik noted documents,which had been filed with the United Nations, and provided evidence of the refusal of the US government to address the corruption of the courts, as part of its duties and obligations pursuant to ratified international law.<br> Dr Zernik also urged Mr Paul to join others in lobbying nations that would be central to the review of Human Rights in the United States by the United Nations. Mr Paul was also urged to come forward and reveal any information that he may have pertaining to case management systems of the California courts, as part of his previous employment with the California Administrative Office of the Courts. The letter repeated allegations that Chief Justice Ronald George was a key figure in the installation of a fraudulent case management system in the Los Angeles Courts circa 1985, the harms of which are suffered to this date. In recent years, the California Administrative Office of the Courts engaged in a large-scale project to install a new California Case Management System – again – with no evidence of public oversight of integrity of the system.<br> Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States.</p> <p>LINKS<br> [1] Letter to the US State Department and the United Nations – providing additional evidence of widespread corruption of the California Courts.<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/34467837/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/34467837/</a><br> [2] Michael Paul v California Administrative Office of the Courts – complaint<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/34467455/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/34467455/</a></p> <p>Human Rights Alert - NGO<br> Locations of visitors to this page </p> <p> <small> <a href="http://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/17/10-07-17-complaint-by-michael-paul-against-california-administrative-office-of-the-courts-alleging-public-corruption-and-racketeering-by-californ-8993435/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p> false-imprisonmentsjudicial-corruptionlos-angeles-countycaliforniahttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/17/10-07-17-complaint-by-michael-paul-against-california-administrative-office-of-the-courts-alleging-public-corruption-and-racketeering-by-californ-8993435/#commentshttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/16/10-07-16-complaint-for-public-corruption-filed-against-presiding-judge-and-clerk-of-the-los-angeles-superior-court-8984896/tag:josephzernik.blog.co.uk,2010-07-16:/2010/07/16/10-07-16-complaint-for-public-corruption-filed-against-presiding-judge-and-clerk-of-the-los-angeles-superior-court-8984896/Fri, 16 Jul 2010 09:37:22 +0200 <p><img src="http://inproperinla.com/pic-mccoy.jpg" alt="" title=""></p> <p><strong>Complaint for Public Corruption against James A Richman Justice of California Court of Appeals, Charles McCoy Presiding Judge, and John A Clarke Clerk, of the Los Angeles Superior Court in RE: Conduct of pretense litigation in Sturgeon v Los Angeles County (BC351286)</strong><br> .<br> Los Angles, July 16 – complaint <strong>[1]</strong> was filed with US Attorney Office, Central District of California, by Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, against James A Richman – Justice of California Court of Appeal, First District, Charles McCoy – Presiding Judge, John A Clarke – Clerk, and others of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, for public corruption and deprivation of rights, relative to their conduct in Sturgeon v Los Angeles County (BC351286). </p> <p>The complaint alleged that the named accused conspired to conduct pretense litigation in the case of Sturgeon v Los Angeles County, where Justice Richman presided with no authority at all and where judgments were falsely represented as entered by him in the case.</p> <p>· Court records showed that Justice Richman routinely referred to himself as presiding in the case as “judge by assignment”. However, no Assignment Order was ever found in court records in the case, as required by law. </p> <p>· Court records further showed that the Los Angeles Superior Court, a party to the same litigation, routinely referred to Justice James A Richman as a presiding “by reference” in the case. However, no Appointment Order was ever found in court records in the case, as required by law for a Referee. </p> <p>· Plaintiff’s counsel referred to Justice James Richman as “designated” to preside in the case. However, no designation record was ever found in the case, either. </p> <p>The complaint noted that no judgment was ever entered in the case, as required by California Code to make it “effectual for any purpose”. However, “not official” court records, published online by the court, falsely represented judgments by James A Richman in the case - in favor of Los Angeles County and the Los Angeles Superior Court and against Plaintiff Sturgeon.</p> <p>Requests, which were forwarded to Justice Richman, to clarify the legal foundation for his authority to preside in the case, were left unanswered. </p> <p>In addition, Presiding Judge Charles McCoy and Clerk of the Court John A Clarke were alleged in the complaint as engaged in an ongoing conspiracy to violate First Amendment rights relative to denial of access to the Register of Actions (California civil docket) and other records in the case. The complaint alleged that through such conduct the Clerk and Presiding Judge continue to cover-up the fraudulent nature of the litigation in the case. </p> <p>The case of Sturgeon v LA County held the highest public policy significance, since it pertained to the taking of “not permitted” payments by Los Angeles County judges, which were called by media “bribes”. Therefore, the complaint alleged that through such conduct, the named accused conspired to deprive all 10 million residents of Los Angeles County of the prospect of honest court services, due process, and fair hearings in years to come.<br> Conduct of the Los Angeles Superior Court and the Los Angeles Justice system was described already in 2001 by Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Founding Dean of the University of California Irvine Law School, as “conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states…”, and the Blue Ribbon Review Panel recommended already in 2006 external investigation of the Los Angeles Superior Court. Regardless, the April 2010 report, filed by Human Rights Alert with the United Nations, documented ongoing refusal of senior officers of the US Department of Justice to enforce the law in Los Angles County, California, and to accord equal protection to its 10 million residents.</p> <p>The complaint was copied to the United Nations and the US State Department, as part of the first ever, 2010 review by the United Nation of Human rights in the United States. Responses by the US State Department to the United Nations are due by August 2010, and the United Nations review session and report are scheduled for November 2010.</p> <p>Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States.</p> <p><strong>LINKS</strong><br> <strong>[1]</strong> 10-07-16 Complaint filed with US Attorney Office against US Magistrate Carla Woehrle and others at the US District Court - for public corruption and deprivation of rights.<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/34408770/"><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/34408770/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/34408770/</a> </a></p> <p> <small> <a href="http://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/16/10-07-16-complaint-for-public-corruption-filed-against-presiding-judge-and-clerk-of-the-los-angeles-superior-court-8984896/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p> judicial-corruptioncaliforniafalse-imprisonmentslos-angeles-countyhttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/16/10-07-16-complaint-for-public-corruption-filed-against-presiding-judge-and-clerk-of-the-los-angeles-superior-court-8984896/#commentshttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/13/10-07-13-alleged-fraud-by-fbi-and-us-department-of-justice-on-the-us-congress-in-re-human-rights-policy-8967773/tag:josephzernik.blog.co.uk,2010-07-13:/2010/07/13/10-07-13-alleged-fraud-by-fbi-and-us-department-of-justice-on-the-us-congress-in-re-human-rights-policy-8967773/Tue, 13 Jul 2010 22:45:45 +0200 <p><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_4QooSf0l1yE/TDzOKM6nCBI/AAAAAAAABlI/GltGPrBvPcc/s1600/FBI+Mueller.jpg"><img src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_4QooSf0l1yE/TDzOKM6nCBI/AAAAAAAABlI/GltGPrBvPcc/s320/FBI+Mueller.jpg" border="0" alt=""></a><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_4QooSf0l1yE/TDzORI9tbtI/AAAAAAAABlQ/7cU43kFYfSw/s1600/FBI+logo.jpg"><img src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_4QooSf0l1yE/TDzORI9tbtI/AAAAAAAABlQ/7cU43kFYfSw/s320/FBI+logo.jpg" border="0" alt=""><br> </a><strong><span>FBI Director Robert Mueller <br> </span></strong><strong><span>Fraud Alleged by FBI and US Department of Justice on the US Congress in re: Human Rights Policy<br> </span></strong><span>Los Angeles, July 13 - Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, claimed ongoing fraud by the US Department of Justice and FBI on the US Congress, regarding statements provided to US Congress in both October 2009 testimony by Arthur M. Cummings - FBI Executive Assistant Director, and in August-September 2009 responses on congressional inquiries  by  Kenneth Kaiser - FBI Assistant Director and Kenneth Melson - US Department of Justice Director.<br> </span><span>In the October 2009 testimony before US congress, Mr Cummins stated  "</span><span>the FBI is committed to supplementing the international community's efforts to advance human rights." </span><span>However, Human Rights Alert claims that the evidence is overwhelming of ongoing refusal of FBI to protect the Human Rights of the people of the United States.<br> </span>In the August-September 2009 written responses to congressional inquiries by the Hon Dianne Feinstein and the Hon Diane Watson, FBI Assistant Director - Kenneth Kaiser and US Department of Justice Director - Kenneth Melson denied claims of racketeering by judges of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, refused to address large-scale false imprisonments in Los Angeles County, and denied equal protection for the 10 million residents of the county, including, but not limited the First Amendment right to access court records - to inspect and to copy.  <br> Human Rights Alert claims that no reasonable person, who would review the record as a whole could honestly deny racketeering by judges of the Los Angeles Superior Court.  <br> The large-scale false imprisonments, were inherent to the claims of racketeering, and were documented in both official and unofficial reports already a decade ago.  Regardless, the victims were never released to this date. Moreover, data recently compiled by Human Rights Alert documented continuance of the pattern of false arrests and false imprisonments by the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department and the Los Angeles Superior Court. <br> The denial of access to court records in Los Angeles County is incontrovertible.  Access to court records - to inspect and to copy, is a fundamental of Due Process and Fair Hearings, and is also recognized in US law as part of the First Amendment. <br> Combined, Human Rights Alert claims that the conduct of FBI and US Department of Justice demonstrates a pattern of refusal to safeguard of the Human Rights of the people, while providing false and deliberately misleading statements to the US Congress, where US executive officers claim the opposite.<br> Consequently, complaints were filed in late 2009 with Glenn A Fine - US Department of Justice Inspector General, alleging fraud by Mr Kaiser and Mr Melson on the US Congress.  Mr Fine refuses to this date to investigate such complaints.<br> Human Rights Alert filed in April 2010 report with the United Nations, <span><strong>[1]</strong></span><span> where such conduct by the US government senior executive officers was claimed as the core of serious violations of Human Rights and ratified international law. <br> </span><span>Response by the US State Department on the reports by various stakeholders is due by August 2010, as part of the first ever review by the United Nations of the Human Rights record of the United States.<br> </span><span><a href="http://www3.clustrmaps.com/counter/maps.php?url=http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/"><img src="http://www3.clustrmaps.com/counter/index2.php?url=http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/" alt="Locations of visitors to this page" width="160" height="106"><br> </a></span><span><strong>LINKS:<br> </strong></span><span><strong>[1] </strong></span><span>April 19, 2010 Human Rights Alert submission for the 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States by the United Nations: <br> </span><span>a) Press Release:<br> </span><span><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/30200004/"><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/30200004/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/30200004/</a><br> </a></span><span>b) Submission:<br> </span><span><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/30147583/"><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/30147583/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/30147583/</a><br> </a></span><span>c) Appendix:<br> </span><span><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/30163613/"><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/30163613/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/30163613/</a><br> </a></span><span>d) UPR Tool Kit by the Urban Justice Center:<br> </span><span><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/29867561/"><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/29867561/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/29867561/</a></a></span> </p> <p> <small> <a href="http://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/13/10-07-13-alleged-fraud-by-fbi-and-us-department-of-justice-on-the-us-congress-in-re-human-rights-policy-8967773/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p> false-imprisonmentsjudicial-corruptionlos-angeles-countycaliforniahttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/13/10-07-13-alleged-fraud-by-fbi-and-us-department-of-justice-on-the-us-congress-in-re-human-rights-policy-8967773/#commentshttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/13/10-07-13-correspondence-with-the-united-nations-re-judicial-corruption-in-the-united-states-8963379/tag:josephzernik.blog.co.uk,2010-07-13:/2010/07/13/10-07-13-correspondence-with-the-united-nations-re-judicial-corruption-in-the-united-states-8963379/Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:54:24 +0200 <p><img src="http://inproperinla.com/pic-un-human-Rights%20Council.jpg" alt=""><br> <strong>What did the experts say about the justice system in Los Angeles County, California?</strong><br> ·<span> "Innocent people remain in prison" </span><br> ·<span> "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."</span><br> LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) [i]<br> · <span>"...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." </span><br> Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) [ii]<br> · <span>"This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."</span><br> Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2000) [iii]<br> [i] LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) <br><a href="10-07-13 Correspondence with the United Nations re: Judicial Corruption in the United States"> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/</a></a><br> [ii] Paper by Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001) <br><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/"> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/</a></a><br> [iii] Paper by Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)<br><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/27433920/"> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/27433920/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/27433920/</a></a></p> <p> Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 13:20:56 +0300<br> To: TB-petitions OHCHR <br> From: joseph zernik <br> <strong><span>Subject: Re: Fw: Complaint filed with US Attorney Office against US Magistrate Carla Woehrle and others at the US District Court, Central District of California - for public corruption and deprivation of rights</span></strong><span>.</span><br> Cc: <a href="mailto:lawsters@googlegroups.com">lawsters@googlegroups.com</a></p> <p> Ms Denise D'aniello<br> UNCHR</p> <p> Dear Ms D'aniello:</p> <p> Thank you for your expedient response. You were copied on the complaint alleging corruption at the US District Court, Los Angeles, as part of efforts to make the OHCHR aware of the level of corruption in the US justice system as part of the 2010 UPR of the United States, scheduled for November 2010.</p> <p> We, who reside in the United States, hope that an effective report be issued as the outcome of the November 2010 review, calling upon the United States to abide by its duties and obligations pursuant to ratified international law - the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.</p> <p> Truly,</p> <p> Joseph Zernik, PhDHuman Rights Alert (HRA), NGOhttp://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert<br> <a href="http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/">http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/</a><br> <a href="http://josephzernik.blog.co.uk/">http://josephzernik.blog.co.uk/</a><br> <a href="http://menchenrechte-los-angeles.blogspot.com/">http://menchenrechte-los-angeles.blogspot.com/</a><br> <a href="http://droitsdelhommealertelosangele.blogspot.com/">http://droitsdelhommealertelosangele.blogspot.com/</a><br> <a href="http://inproperinla.com/">http://inproperinla.com/</a><br> <a href="http://pressroom.prlog.org/Human_Rights_Alert/">http://pressroom.prlog.org/Human_Rights_Alert/</a><br> <a href="http://ireport.cnn.com/people/HumanRightsA?numResults=10&view=documents">http://ireport.cnn.com/people/HumanRightsA?numResults=10&view=documents</a><br> <span> </span><a href="http://www3.clustrmaps.com/counter/maps.php?url=http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/"><img src="http://www3.clustrmaps.com/counter/index2.php?url=http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/" alt="Locations of visitors to this page" width="160" height="106"></a></p> <p> <strong><span>At 12:29 PM 7/13/2010, Ms D'aniello wrote:</span></strong><br> Dear Mr. Zernik,<br> After careful consideration of the contents of your complaint dated 12 July 2010, we sincerely regret having to inform you that the Petitions Unit of the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights is not in a position to assist you in the matter you raise.<br> The Human Rights Committee cannot examine petitions alleging violations of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) unless the State is also a party to the Optional Protocol (OP). United States of America is not a State party to the Optional Protocol. <br> Please accept our apologies for not replying in a more personal manner. You may understand that, while we appreciate your reasons for writing to us, the existing procedures require that it is ascertained whether certain preliminary criteria are satisfied before proceeding with the examination of a petition.<br> Depending on the nature of your claims, you may wish to address the so-called Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council. In order to invoke any of the Special Procedures, a state should be a party to the UN Charter only. For more information on the Special Procedures, please consult:http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/chr/special/index.htm <br> Yours sincerely,<br> The Petitions Unit <br> On 7/12/2010, Dr Zernik wrote:<br> ----- Forwarded by Denise D'aniello/UNCHR/UN on 12.07.2010 11:44 ----- joseph zernik <br> 12.07.2010 03:17 <br> To<br> <a href="mailto:upr_info@state.gov">upr_info@state.gov</a>, <a href="mailto:UPRsubmissions@ohchr.org">UPRsubmissions@ohchr.org</a> <br> cc<br> <strong><span>Subject:Complaint filed with US Attorney Office against US Magistrate Carla Woehrle and others at the US District Court, Central District of California - for public corruption and deprivation of rights. </span></strong></p> <p> TO: US Attorney, Central District of California<br> FROM: Joseph Zernik, PhD, and Human Rights Alert</p> <p> Please accept the attached and linked complaint against US Magistrate Carla Woehrle and others at the US District Court, Central District of California - for public corruption and deprivation of rights.</p> <p> Executive Summary<br> Los Angles, July 12 � complaint [1] was filed with US Attorney Office, Central District of California, by Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, against US Magistrate Carla Woehrle and others at the US District Court, Central District of California, alleging public corruption and deprivation of rights under the color of law pertaining to their conduct in the cases of Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) andZernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) at the US District Court � as part of cover up of alleged widespread corruption of the judges of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. The complaint alleged that Magistrate Carla Woehrle, US Judges Virginia Phillips and John Walter, Clerk of the Court Terri Nafisi, Pro Se Clerk Chris Sawyer, and Courtroom Assistant Donna Thomas conspired to conduct in the two cases litigations, which were never deemed by the US Court itself as honest, valid, and effectual court actions. Instead � they conducted pretense litigations. <In Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914), former US prosecutor Richard Fine filed a petition for a writ for habeas corpus. Richard Fine was arrested on March 4, 2009 in the court of Judge David, Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, with no warrant at all. He has been held in solitary confinement ever since, with no judgment, conviction, or sentencing ever entered in his case. </p> <p> In Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550), Joseph Zernik filed complaint alleging deprivation of rights by a group of judges of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, who forced him to leave his residence under the threat of force, took his home for private use with no compensation at all, and conducted conveyance of title, which was opined by fraud expert of the highest reputation as real estate fraud. No judgment was ever entered in the case of Joseph Zernik at the Superior Court of California either, no writ of execution was issued, and the court distributed the proceeds of the sale in what was alleged as money laundering.</p> <p> Both Richard Fine and Joseph Zernik attempted to protect their rights by filing complaints at the US District Court, and both cases ended up in the court of US Magistrate Carla Woehrle. The cases were presided by Judges John Walter and Virginia Phillips, respectively.</p> <p> Conduct of named accused, detailed in the complaint, allegedly included, but was limited to:<br> 1. Adulteration of commencing records in both cases;<br> 2. Denial of plaintiff's right to file papers in court, by eliminating paper from the dockets with no due process of law;<br> 3. Production of adulterated court dockets, by permitting conduct of numerous transactions in the dockets by unauthorized court personnel;<br> 4. Conduct of fraudulent litigations, by permitting defendants' counsel, who were not counsel of record, to appear and file false records with no authority at all;<br> 5. Fraud on plaintiffs, through the Issuing of minutes, orders, and judgments with no authentication at all, yet nevertheless falsely publishing such void, not voidable judicial records in PACER dockets as "entered</p> <p> </p> <p> <small> <a href="http://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/13/10-07-13-correspondence-with-the-united-nations-re-judicial-corruption-in-the-united-states-8963379/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p> los-angeles-countycaliforniafalse-imprisonmentsjudicial-corruptionhttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/13/10-07-13-correspondence-with-the-united-nations-re-judicial-corruption-in-the-united-states-8963379/#commentshttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/12/10-07-12-complaint-filed-with-us-attorney-office-against-us-magistrate-carla-woehrle-and-others-at-the-us-district-court-central-district-of-cali-8955204/tag:josephzernik.blog.co.uk,2010-07-12:/2010/07/12/10-07-12-complaint-filed-with-us-attorney-office-against-us-magistrate-carla-woehrle-and-others-at-the-us-district-court-central-district-of-cali-8955204/Mon, 12 Jul 2010 03:54:31 +0200 <p> <img src="http://inproperinla.com/pic-collins_audrey_judge.jpg" alt="" title=""> <img src="http://inproperinla.com/pic-US%20DIst%20court,%20la%20sealOver.jpg" alt="" title=""><br> <em>Chief Judge Audrey Collins, US District Court, Central District of California</em><br> <strong>Complaint filed with US Attorney Office against US Magistrate Carla Woehrle and others at the US District Court, Central District of California - for public corruption and deprivation of rights.</strong><br> Los Angles, July 12 - complaint [1] was filed with US Attorney Office, Central District of California, by Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, against US Magistrate Carla Woehrle and others at the US District Court, Central District of California, alleging public corruption and deprivation of rights under the color of law pertaining to their conduct in the cases of Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) and Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) at the US District Court - as part of cover up of alleged widespread corruption of the judges of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. The complaint alleged that Magistrate Carla Woehrle, US Judges Virginia Phillips and John Walter, Clerk of the Court Terri Nafisi, Pro Se Clerk Chris Sawyer, and Courtroom Assistant Donna Thomas conspired to conduct in the two cases litigations, which were never deemed by the US Court itself as honest, valid, and effectual court actions. Instead - they conducted pretense litigations. </p> <p>In Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914), former US prosecutor Richard Fine filed a petition for a writ for habeas corpus. Richard Fine was arrested on March 4, 2009 in the court of Judge David, Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, with no warrant at all. He has been held in solitary confinement ever since, with no judgment, conviction, or sentencing ever entered in his case. </p> <p>In Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550), Joseph Zernik filed complaint alleging deprivation of rights by a group of judges of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, who forced him to leave his residence under the threat of force, took his home for private use with no compensation at all, and conducted conveyance of title, which was opined by fraud expert of the highest reputation as real estate fraud. No judgment was ever entered in the case of Joseph Zernik at the Superior Court of California either, no writ of execution was issued, and the court distributed the proceeds of the sale in what was alleged as money laundering.</p> <p>Both Richard Fine and Joseph Zernik attempted to protect their rights by filing complaints at the US District Court, and both cases ended up in the court of US Magistrate Carla Woehrle. The cases were presided by Judges John Walter and Virginia Phillips, respectively.</p> <p>Conduct of named accused, detailed in the complaint, allegedly included, but was limited to:<br> 1. Adulteration of commencing records in both cases;<br> 2. Denial of plaintiff's right to file papers in court, by eliminating paper from the dockets with no due process of law;<br> 3. Production of adulterated court dockets, by permitting conduct of numerous transactions in the dockets by unauthorized court personnel;<br> 4. Conduct of fraudulent litigations, by permitting defendants' counsel, who were not counsel of record, to appear and file false records with no authority at all;<br> 5. Fraud on plaintiffs, through the Issuing of minutes, orders, and judgments with no authentication at all, yet nevertheless falsely publishing such void, not voidable judicial records in PACER dockets as "entered", as if they required "full faith and credit";<br> Conduct of the accused was alleged as deliberate perversion of justice, through pretense of judicial review. Conduct of the accused is further alleged as intended to cover up widespread corruption of the judges of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, and therefore - public corruption, in and of itself.<br> Consequently, Clerk of the Court Terri Nafisi repeatedly denied Dr Zernik access to court records in the two cases, in alleged violation of First Amendment rights. Moreover, to this date Clerk of the Court Terri Nafisi refuses to certify the dockets in the two cases as dockets, which were constructed pursuant to the authority of the clerk and the law of the United States.<br> Furthermore, both Clerk of the Court Terri Nafisi and Chief Judge Audrey Collins refused to initiate corrective actions, as required by law, after being duly informed of the conduct detailed in the complaint.<br> The complaint requested that the US Attorney provide equal protection to the former US prosecutor Richard Fine and to Dr Joseph Zernik. The complaint further requested that the US Attorney conduct investigation in the matter and prosecute the accused, if appropriate, to the full extent of the law.<br> The complaint was copied to the United Nations and the US State Department, to the Honorable Dianne Feinstein - Senator from California, and to the US Congress Judiciary Committees.</p> <p>In April 2010, Human Rights Alert (NGO) filed complaint with the United Nations alleging widespread corruption of the justice system of Los Angeles County, California, and refusal of the US government to take action to provide equal protection for the 10 million residents of the county. The complaint was filed as part of the first ever Universal Periodic Review of Human Rights in the United States by the United Nations, scheduled for November 2010.</p> <p>LINKS<br> [1] 10-07-12 Complaint filed with US Attorney Office against US Magistrate Carla Woehrle and others at the US District Court - for public corruption and deprivation of rights.<br> <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/34194403/">http://www.scribd.com/doc/34194403/</a></p> <p>Please sign the petition - Free Richard Fine<br> <a href="http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine">http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine</a> </p> <p> <small> <a href="http://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/12/10-07-12-complaint-filed-with-us-attorney-office-against-us-magistrate-carla-woehrle-and-others-at-the-us-district-court-central-district-of-cali-8955204/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p> californialos-angeles-countyjudicial-corruptionfalse-imprisonmentshttp://Josephzernik.blog.co.uk/2010/07/12/10-07-12-complaint-filed-with-us-attorney-office-against-us-magistrate-carla-woehrle-and-others-at-the-us-district-court-central-district-of-cali-8955204/#comments